<span>There are several terms that are indicative of the tendency to get away from the unknown, including:
Aversion to ambiguity
Clustering illusion
Anchoring and adjustment
Recency bias
Availability bias</span>
Answer:
The statement that proves to be true is that the researcher will not interact with the participants.
Explanation:
The reason to support the statement is because the researcher should not be conducting any behavior as he/ she wishes to find genuine types of interaction that may lead to the main goal which is to show cooperation between peers. If there was anything planned or spoken between peers and researcher, then the latter would not be ethic when going through the observation method to gather the information that is intended to be used.
Answer: Party loyalists are likely to vote for all of their party's candidates in any election.
Answer:
using a rhetorical question
Explanation:
A rhetorical question is styled to make an effect or to lay emphasis on some point and not in a need for real answer. In literature, it is used as an impressive persuasive device. For example, if someone asks " who is better than me" not to get an answer but to enforce that he is the best. In the above-mentioned question, Faith posed this question as a taunt to her classmate and not to obtain an answer.
Answer:
The dependent variable and the independent variable.
Explanation:
The study found that students who were identified as upper-class took more candies than others. Two variables were recorded in order to conclude these findings, the independent variable, and the dependent variable. The <em>independent variable</em> was the <em>social status</em>, upper-class students and lower-class students. The<em> dependent variable</em> was unethical behavior represented by the<em> number of candies</em> each student took. These candies were meant for children in a nearby laboratory.
