If this is a true/false question, I'd say true
<span>Well, the most immediate contextual change is the setting itself: from Spain to the United States. Both have diverse terrains, but the connected-ness of the USA (via highways/interstates) would allow for a differently paced story. Additionally, the "resurrection of chivalry" would be replaced with some other revival movement to a "simpler time" and its ethics. To be fair, that notion is already prevalent among many conservatives and anti-progressives. The discourses between new Quixote and Panza would likely be as fire-y as recent Presidential debates, stoked in populist ideals and failed promises from those recent agents of change to society as a whole. Overall, it would be an interesting take on an old classic, and likely prompt serious discussion about our romanticizing of the past.</span>
Answer:
Have.
Explanation:
eirther manu or i has to go. This sentence is not correct grammatically speaking.
eirther manu or i have to go. This does make sense grammatically
Answer:
Crisis, Exposition, Complication, Dénouement
Explanation:
While Napoleon was speaking about changes on the farm with the humans, he mentioned about more work and lowering the food rations.
He made the animals pamper him and abolished the song "Beasts of England".
This helped to erase the evidence of the revolution in people's minds.
