The Supreme Court treat gerrymandering issues in 2019 as it allowed prejudiced gerrymandering by ruling that judgments about it are beyond the reach of the bar.
<h3>Is gerrymandering is a major problem in the United States? </h3>
The United States Supreme Court has declared in Millerv. Johnson( 1995) that ethnical gerrymandering is a violation of indigenous rights and upheld opinions against redistricting that's deliberately cooked grounded on race. still, the Supreme Court has plodded when prejudiced gerrymandering occurs.
It allowed prejudiced gerrymandering by ruling that judgments about it are beyond the reach of the bar. The manipulation may correspond of" cracking"( lacing the voting power of the opposing party's sympathizers across numerous sections) or" packing"( concentrating the opposing party's voting power in one quarter to reduce their voting power in other sections). Gerrymandering can also be used to cover incumbents.
Learn further about the Supreme court here: https//brainly.com/question/18228641
#SPJ4
Answer:
I just googled, it has to be something to confirm your identity, so it can be anything
Explanation:
Google
Well the two patterns are when it turns into a caterpillar, and the second would be when it breaks out of the cocoon to turn into a beautiful butterfly
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Luca cause earthquakes. I heard about luca
Answer: The physician is being sued. Insurance company should provide an attorney. If the doctor is negligent, insurance company should pay (that's why we have premiums). Dr. Z is sued, goes to agency, and notifies the agency. The agency doesn't notify Aetna in right amount of time, and also notifies the wrong company. Aetna doesn't have a liability because they were not notified in a timely manner. Larson is agent to Aetna. A principal's notice to agent=notice to principal. That's the same as notifying Aetna according to its claims procedure. This is not Dr.Z's problem. Aetna is wrong in denying coverage, and Dr.Z will succeed and not have to pay.
