Answer:
Instructions are listed below.
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
A friend of Mr. Richards recently won a law suit for $30 million. They can either take the payments over 10 years or settle today for cash of $25 million. Mr. Richard is optimistic that he can earn a 6% return on the money and that they should settle for $25 million today and he will invest it for them.
First, we need to find the present value of the 30 million.
To do that we need to calculate the final value.
FV= {A*[(1+i)^n-1]}/i
A= annual deposit
FV= {3,000,000*[(1.06^10)-1]}/0.06= 39,542,385
PV= FV/(1+i)^n= 39,542,385/1.06^10= 22,080,261
B) Now we know that the present value of option B is higher. One dollar today is better than one dollar tomorrow. It is better to receive the money now to invest it.
Answer:
The present value of the cashflows will be $12830.30
Explanation:
The present value of the cashflows can be calculated by dividing the cash flows by the appropriate discount rate and for the appropriate time period.
The present value of the given cash flows will be,
Present Value = CF1 / (1+r) + CF2 / (1+r)^2 + .... + CFn / (1+r)^n
As the first payment is received today, it will already be in the present value so it will not be discounted.
Present value = 2000 + 3000 / (1+0.1) + 5000 / (1+0.1)^3 + 7000 / (1+0.1)^5
Present value = $12830.295 rounded off to $12830.30
Answer:
No, Hines is not guilty of unlawful price descrimination
Explanation:
Hines actions has not meet the criteria for price discrimination which include giving different prices based on gender, race or religion and never prevented the resale of product and the product package for sale never indicated the inclusion of free demonstrator and free advertising material.
Answer:
The degree of wealth and material comfort available to a person or community.
Explanation:
How nice the way they live their life is
