Liability that can occur when a person’s careless and inattentive actions cause harm is called criminal negligence.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Criminal negligence is carelessness which needs a greater degree of guilt than the civil negligence norm. The civil definition of negligence is characterized as failing to obey a reasonable person's standard of behavior in the same circumstance as the offender. To demonstrate this negligence, the plaintiff needs to prove the state of mind engaged in it beyond possible doubt.
If a person is guilty of some crime, he or she must behave with a male rea or a criminal intent. However, under very limited cases, criminal negligence may override criminal intent. When it does, even though the acts are accidental, it may expose somebody to serious offenses like child danger or homicide.
The correct answer is C; It is improper for Joe to assume these responsibilities as he may not sign documents using Dan's name.
Further Explanation:
Joe can't sign the attorneys name on any legal questions or documents on the titles. This is unethical as this is forgery since he isn't signing his own name. If Joe does sign off with the attorneys signature and the search was not correct then the attorney, Sally, and Joe will all be in legal trouble.
The attorney will have to review Sally's work and sign off on it. Since Joe is an attorney, he could actually sign his own name to these papers if it is within his job description and there would be no issues.
Learn more about paralegals at brainly.com/question/1878109
#LearnwithBrainly
Answer:
IT DONT SHOW KNOW QUESTION
Explanation:
Answer:
Making citizens of the states also citizens of the Union.
Explanation:
Through this passage, and specifically by establishing that all the free inhabitants of the states would enjoy the same rights in the other states in which they were not residents.
Thus, by guaranteeing a unity of rights throughout the territory of the Union, the Articles of Confederation sought to reaffirm the legal unity of all the states, in order to form not only a country with legal security for its inhabitants, but a nation with unified legal criteria at the government level.
I believe if the are underange he may be forced unless certain situations things like joint custody might come into play. joint physical custody is where a court orders a child to spend a substantial amount of time with both parents during the course of the year. Second, joint legal custody is where, although one parent may have full physical custody, both parents must agree on any decisions that impact the child, such as their education, medical care and spiritual matters. Lastly, both joint physical and legal custody is a combination of the first two. IT IS ULTIMATELY up to the court to decide whether any type of joint custody is in the best interests of a child. If not, the parent with primary custodial rights over a child will get to decide what kind of visitation for the other parent is fair and reasonable. In many situations, this works out well for both parents and they can often come to an amicable arrangement regarding visitation hours and days.
