Answer:
d) redistributive taxation is unjust unless it remedies some past injustice
Explanation:
Rawls and Nozick were two American Philosophers, who took stand for inequality and injustice in U.S.
They both oppose the progressive system, which favors increase of tax as a share of the base size increases.
According to Rawls and Nozick, redistributive taxation should provide benefit to the people who have faced injustice in past through any mechanism such as schools, direct transfer, health care or other program that improve prospects of the poorest and injustice people.
Hence, the correct answer is d.
Answer:
the others are already answered
Explanation:
For general intent, the prosecution need only prove that the defendant intended to do the act in question, whereas proving specific intent would require the prosecution to prove that the defendant intended to bring about a specific consequence through his or her actions, or that he or she perform the action
Where is the whole question?
1. what are the clients business purpose and objectives?
2. what are the structure and operations of the deal?
3. who will likely use the document going forward?
