Answer:
-60+87d
or
87d-60
Step-by-step explanation:
-3(20+-29d)=
-60+87d
Answer:
A. 4
Step-by-step explanation:
We can look at the number line and find B and A
we get
B=-7
A=3
now, we can find |B| and |A|
now, we can find
|B|-|A|
now, we can plug values
So,
option-A
Step-by-step explanation:
b is per the identity of angles on parallel lines when intersected by one inclined line the same as the 40° angle.
so,
b = 40°
due to the parallel nature of the 2 lines there is a symmetry effect for such shapes inscribed a circle. the upper and the lower triangle must be similar. and when applying a vertical line through the central crossing point, everything to the left is mirrored by everything on the right.
so, angle c must be equal to angle b.
c = 40°
and as the sum of all angles in a triangle is always 180°, d is then
d = 180 - 40 - 40 = 100°
the interior angle of the arc angle a is the supplementary angle of d (together they are 180°), because together with d they cover the full down side of the top-left to bottom-right line.
interior angle to a = 180 - 100 = 80°
due to the symmetry again, the arc angle opposite to a is the same as a.
as we know, the interior angle to a pair of opposing arc angles is the mean value of the 2 angles.
so, we have
(a + a)/2 = 80
2a/2 = 80
a = 80°
there might (and actually should) be some more direct approaches for "a" out of the other pieces of information, but that was the most straight one right out of my mind, and I don't spend time on finding additional shortcuts, when I have already a working approach.
A. It is an experiment as the sales director is applying treatment ( the training ) to a group and recording the results.
B. I would have 250 sales representatives from each region take the training and 250 from each region to not take it so i can be able to see if it affects both regions differently. The representatives from each region would be chosen at random and the length of their training would be the same for all.
C. now you would only be able to have 200 people from each region train. this would lower the percentage of the impact the training had on the amount of sales ( if any) . For example, if the original 250 trained people in a region increased the sales in that region by 20 percent and 50 of those people ended up not actually training, the sales would have only increased by 16 percent.
D. correlational research is best to establish causality. for example, the amount of training the representatives got may affect how much they are able to sell. also the number of representatives trained may affect the amount sold
450=50x this should be correct :)
