Answer:
Original amount invested = $3400 .
Step-by-step explanation:
Let the original investment of Steve = $x
Stock increased in the first year = 50% of amount invested
Therefore total amount after one year = x + 0.5x = 1.5x
Commission paid to the stock broker = $350
Amount lost by him = $400
Amount withdrawn by him = $300
Total amount decreased from the amount after 1 year
= 1.5x - (350 + 400 + 300)
= 1.5x - 1050
This remaining amount is doubled, so the final amount
= 2(1.5x - 1050)
= 3x - 2100
This final amount is equal to $8100
3x - 2100 = 8100
3x = 8100 + 2100
3x = 10200
x = $3400
Therefore original amount invested in the stock market was $3400 .
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
a. H0: μ ≤ 104 Ha: μ > 104
Assuming the data leads to the rejection of the null hypothesis, we would conclude that there is no sufficient statistical evidence to prove that the cost of electricity for an efficient home in a particular neighborhood of Cincinnati, Ohio, was $104 per month.
b. The type error in this situation would be rejecting the null hypothesis when it is actually true. Rejecting the fact that the cost of electricity for an efficient home in a particular neighborhood of Cincinnati, Ohio, was $104 per month when it was actually true.
c. Type II error in this case would be failing to reject the null when it is false. Failing to reject the fact that the cost of electricity for an efficient home in a particular neighborhood of Cincinnati, Ohio, was $104 per month when it is actually not true.
The consequences for these errors might be disastrous including sueing of the accuser party etc.
Answer: (B) vertex B vertex Y
Step-by-step explanation:
Just Thought I Should Help Anyone Out For GEOMETRY ; ) BTW im a girl
Answer:
Part A: 40% are pennies
Part B: NIckels 10, Quarters 20, Pennis 20
This expression is correct. It shows the price John pays for the jeans on the left side of the + symbol (30n), and the amount of tax he has to pay on the right side of the symbol (0.08(30n)).
Hope this helps!
