In health and social care, as a practicioner you're usually required to not disclose any information about your client openly to other people. 
The only exemption here is when doing an super- or intervision with your peers, here you can "breach" this confidentiality with obviously still presenting this person as an anonymous case. 
Another exemption is when you're given information that revolves around possible hurting other people or self-hurting coming from the client itself. 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
Bankrupt
Explanation:
A person or company is declared bankrupt by the law when they are most unable to meet their obligations at the time they are due.  Another way to describe such people is INSOLVENT. At this point the bankrupt person is made to use his personal property or if a company, assets are sold to pay off the debts.
 
        
             
        
        
        
An archaeon in a nutrient-poor environment is most likely to use <u>facilitated diffusion</u> for nutrient uptake.
<h3>What is an archaeon?</h3>
This organism represent 1 of the 3 primary lineages of modern cellular organisms revealed by sequence analysis of highly conserved macromolecules. It is consistent with their status as a third form of life and  exhibit certain characteristics of bacteria as well as some certain characteristics of eukaryotes and other characteristics unique to themselves.
These organism are thought to have diverged from bacteria because it utilizes distinct GTFs and promoters. During the time of the great divergence, the archaea utilized transcription followed by reverse transcription to synthesize DNA. Hence, the promoters for RNA synthesis initiation were also replication origins and GTFs, promoters, and RNA polymerase were even more important and central functions than they are today in archaea and bacteria. 
However, when this organism is in a nutrient-poor environment, it is most likely to use facilitated diffusion for nutrient uptake.
Read more about archaeon
brainly.com/question/1234197
#SPJ1
 
        
             
        
        
        
 Yes.
I believe, some right could be considered more fundamental for humans' well being compared to others.
For example, i will argue that the right to live will be a lot more important than the right to receive government help, because without government help, people still could find various ways to sustain our own lives