<span><span><span>Public debate - radioactive wastes management</span>International Nuclear Information System (INIS)</span>Between September 2005 and January 2006 a national debate<span> has been organized on the radioactive wastes management. This </span>debate<span> aimed to inform the </span>public<span> and to allow him to give his opinion. This document presents, the reasons of this </span>debate<span>, the operating, the synthesis of the results and technical documents to bring information in the domain of radioactive wastes management.</span>
</span>
I would say that being anti-racist does not describe America after the abolition of slavery. For decades, up until maybe the 60's African American's were mistreated with things like Jim Crow Laws, that were stopped some time in 1964. While this had ended segregation it most definitely did not end racism. Even now hate groups, like the KKK, are very prominent in America, with over 1,000 recorded in 2018.
Answer:
Nature is presented as superior to humans in all inevitability in the text.
Explanation:
When the text beings, the two brothers treat nature as something they can easily control as they wish to but as it progresses, the strife between the brothers begins to culminate. It represents the infighting between humans.
Von Gradwitz and Znaeym eventually lose to the nature, not to each other as they fought for a narrow strip of forest for so long.
They remain the true interlopers of the story and the nature triumphs as something that cannot be overcome by any man.
Answer:
You should go back to the story, and then rephrase it, because that 's what I did.
Explanation:
