The answer is c for the problem
Answer:
The Dred Scott decision ruled that Scott was still a slave, and therefore, and no right to file suit in a United States court as he was not a citizen and did not have the rights of such.
Explanation:
In the court case Dred Scott vs. Stanford.
Problems they faced were coming back to America, without any food and money , also they suffered loss of friends and family who were also in the war. A country usually has to recoup after a war, which usually causes an increase in poverty and homelessness. So summarily the freedman had to build their lives again and adapt to the new environment of America.
Look up the Intolerable Acts. that was one of the many acts put in the 13 colonies before the Battle of Lexington and Concord, which was officially the first battle between the British and colonists. Basically everything through the French and Indian War debt to the Boston Tea Party. The colonists didnt have a representation in parliament, hence the phrase "no taxation without representation!" the key here is representation, they did not have a say in what they wanted to do. they were living off of salutary neglect and it was absurd to them that they were given rules without a say.
