Answer:
The correct option is B. Attributes, interests and convictions are part of identity.
Explanation:
Identity can be described as the qualities a person possesses. The personality of a person, his/her likes and dislikes, beliefs of a person all represent the identity of a person. Hence, Option B is correct.
Other options like social identity are incorrect because social identity depicts the identity of a person in a group. It does not explain the attributes and interests of the person. Religion is incorrect religion does not define the behaviour and attributes of a person.
Answer:
- Violation of personal rights
Explanation:
As per the details provided, the given situation would exemplify a 'breach of personal rights.' It would be considered 'Larceny' meaning 'unlawful taking of the personal property as an attempt to deprive the legal owner of it permanently,' Says the FBI. Therefore, <u>the couple can be charged under the violation of the man's individual/personal rights as they took his money without even asking for his consent</u>. Such a crime has a punishment of imprisonment of the guilty for five years along with the fine depending on the amount or amount of property is taken over and how.
"Conservatives<span>, placed a congratulatory advertisement in </span>The London Evening News with this statement...(fan created)
The answer is False. In a young age, we are conditioned to think of mathematics as a subject in which there can be no discussion, no possibility of an alternative opinion. So it is no surprise that this subject give more anxiety than in any other subject, it was said the reaction in this subject is more extreme.
Social Darwinism is the theory that B) life consists of competitive struggles in which only the strong survive. This theory applies Darwin's theory of natural selection to the social and political world. Those who supported this idea believe that in the social realm it is the responsibility of individuals to succeed and that those who are strong enough will and those that are not will fail. Those that support this theory did not support government programs to help the poor and other socially beneficial government policies.
