Hello!
➽─────── Jace is here: ────────❥
⋆﹥━━━━━━━━ EXPLANATION: ━━━━━━━━﹤⋆
Because:
⋆ FIRST:
Determine the of the Facts of the crime.
2. Ascertain from the first officer at of the scene of the nature and status in the case.
3. Apprehend of the Criminal. Determine if immediate a pursuit of the perpetrator is advisable; if so detail of the officers to this task.
Hope It Helped! :)
And Tell me if the answer is wrong. . .
Good Luck With Your Assignment!
#LearnWithBrainly
┍━━━━ ⋆⋅ Answer: ⋅⋆ ━━━━┑
⚝──⭒─ Jace ─⭒──⚝
Answer:
Under both statutes.
Explanation:
The meeting shown in the question above managed to violate two statutes, according to the statute developed to combat organized crime, in addition to violating the study that prohibits interstate drug transport. In that case, the convict must be tried for two infractions in different statutes and if convicted he must be convicted based on the guidelines of the two statutes.
When a court decision is final it gives an example to follow for future cases that are similar in nature, what is this called?
Stare decisis ( a doctrine that every court must follow)
¿Puedes por favor ser más específico?
