Answer:
Right to an attorney
Explanation:
This case was to determine if everyone has equal rights in the court of law, specifically the right to be awarded a counsel if not able to afford one. Clarence Earl Gideon, a drifter was arrested for breaking and entering and petty larceny. Clarence couldn't afford a counsel and was not appointed one, so he had to defend himself and subsequently lost. He had to serve 5 years in jail, Gideon argued in his appeal that he had been denied counsel and, therefore, his Sixth Amendment rights, as applied to the states by the Fourteenth Amendment, had been violated. The decision was announced as being unanimous in favor of Gideon, saying “if desired by a defendant who could not afford to hire counsel, was a fundamental right under the United States Constitution, binding on the states, and essential for a fair trial and due process of law regardless of the circumstances of the case.”
To me at least it would be the first answer. if you would like a proper explanation to this let me know :D
<span />
The American Indians who became signatories agreed to relinquish all claims to land south and east of a boundary that began roughly at the mouth of the Cuyahoga River. It ran southward to Fort Laurens and then turned westward to Fort Loramie and Fort Recovery. <span>The whites agreed to relinquish their claims to land north and west of the line, although the American Indians permitted the Americans to establish several trading posts in their territory. </span>
Hi , the answer is B , Cuba 's economy weakened.
