All categories

3 years ago

Why might a company try to deceptive with its labeling information?

Business

1 answer:

irina [24]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

a company May believe you might buy the product if you didn't know the negative things about it

Explanation:

would would you buy hot dogs if you knew how they were made?

You might be interested in

Anderson Corporation has purchased a group of assets for $ 15,600. The assets and their relative market values are listed below.

IceJOKER [234]

Answer:

D: $8,580

Explanation:

Land = $7,400*$ 15,600/13400

= $8,580

Therefore, The amounts would be debited to the Land account is $8,580.

3 0

3 years ago

For the most recent year, Camargo, Inc., had sales of $594,000, cost of goods sold of $255,330, depreciation expense of $67,900,

defon

Answer: 2.61 times

Explanation:

Times Interest ratio = Earnings before Interest and Tax / Interest

Earnings before Interest and tax = Sales - Cost of goods sold - Depreciation expenses

= 594,000 - 255,330 - 67,900

= $270,770

Net Income = Addition to retained earnings + Total dividends paid

Net income = 80,300 + ( 27,500 * 1.64)

= $125,400

Earnings before tax = Net Income/ ( 1 - T)

= 125,400/ ( 1 - 0.25)

= $167,200

Interest = Earnings before interest & tax (EBIT) - Earnings before tax (EBT)

= 270,770 - 167,200

= $103,570

Times Interest ratio = 270,770 / 103,570

= 2.61 times

5 0

4 years ago

1.Based on the above article, if you were an entrepreneur, which sector would fit you the most? Justify your answer by conductin

Harrizon [31]

Answer:

Incomplete question. However, I inferred you want to know more about the Five forces Model created by Michael E. Porter and about the conducting entrepreneurial feasibility study.

Explanation:

Note that the main focus of Poter's model is to help someone analysing a market know how much competition will exist in and the chances of realizing a profit. The five forces to be analyzed are:

The threat of substitutes,
the threat of new entrants,
competitive rivalry
bargaining power of buyers and
bargaining power of customers.

Thus, conducting an entrepreneurial feasibility study would involve a careful cross-examination of the factors mentioned above.

3 0

3 years ago

Which of the following is an accounting procedure that (1) estimates and reports bad debts expense from credit sales during the

Murljashka [212]

Allowance method of accounting for bad debts .

Option - B

Explanation:

The financial accounting term payments method refers to a system that is unplayable and records a bad debt expenditure estimate in the same period of accounting as the purchase. The deduction is used to adjust the cash flow accounts receivable.

The payment method is a better solution to the direct payment method because it is in line with the matching accounting theory.

Bad debts expenses are recognized soon since bad debts are likely and can be estimated to a fairly precise degree so that they meet the criteria necessary to recognize predicated losses and recognize the costs of bad debts.

7 0

3 years ago

Manning Imports is contemplating an agreement to lease equipment to a customer for five years. Manning normally sells the asset

qwelly [4]

Answer:

Manning Imports

The amount of the quarterly lease payments (beginning at the inception of the lease) in order for Manning to recover its normal selling price as well as be compensated for financing the asset over the lease term should be:

Payment Every Quarter = $5,266.65

Explanation:

a) Data and Calculations:

Cash price of equipment = $100,000

Reasonable rate of interest = 8%

Lease period = 5 years

Payment period = 20

From an online financial calculator:

Payment Every Quarter $5,266.65

Total of 20 Payments $105,332.90

Total Interest $5,332.90

Lease Amortization Schedule with quarterly payment of $5,266.65:

Beginning Balance Interest Principal Ending Balance

1 $100,000.00 $500.00 $4,766.65 $95,233.35

2 $95,233.35 $476.17 $4,790.48 $90,442.88

3 $90,442.88 $452.21 $4,814.43 $85,628.45

4 $85,628.45 $428.14 $4,838.50 $80,789.94

Year #1 End

5 $80,789.94 $403.95 $4,862.70 $75,927.25

6 $75,927.25 $379.64 $4,887.01 $71,040.24

7 $71,040.24 $355.20 $4,911.44 $66,128.79

8 $66,128.79 $330.64 $4,936.00 $61,192.79

Year #2 End

9 $61,192.79 $305.96 $4,960.68 $56,232.11

10 $56,232.11 $281.16 $4,985.48 $51,246.63

11 $51,246.63 $256.23 $5,010.41 $46,236.21

12 $46,236.21 $231.18 $5,035.46 $41,200.75

Year #3 End

13 $41,200.75 $206.00 $5,060.64 $36,140.11

14 $36,140.11 $180.70 $5,085.94 $31,054.16

15 $31,054.16 $155.27 $5,111.37 $25,942.79

16 $25,942.79 $129.71 $5,136.93 $20,805.86

Year #4 End

17 $20,805.86 $104.03 $5,162.62 $15,643.24

18 $15,643.24 $78.22 $5,188.43 $10,454.81

19 $10,454.81 $52.27 $5,214.37 $5,240.44

20 $5,240.44 $26.20 $5,240.44 -$0.00

Year #5 End

3 0

3 years ago