15.B
16.B
17.B
18.A
19.B
hope this helped!
Mark Brainliest please
Just
Refer to events that recently occurred
Examples:
Are you hungry? – No, I’ve just had dinner.
Is Tom here? – No, I’m afraid he’s just gone out.
Already
An action that has happened at an unspecified time before now. It suggests that there is no need for repetition
Can be placed before the main verb (past participle) or at the end of the sentence
Examples:
What time does the film start? – It has already started.
What time does the film start? – It has started already.
Yet
Refer to events that have occurred up to now
Examples:
He hasn’t arrived yet.
Have you eaten the apples yet?
For
Talk about a period or duration of time
Doesn’t have to be an exact number, but it needs to refer to a period of time
Examples:
He has lived in Paris for a long time.
We’re going to New York for the weekend.
Since
Refer to a specific point in time
Examples:
I have lived here since 2010.
I have been walking since 5 p.m.
Ever/Never
Express the idea of an unidentified time before now
Always placed before the main verb (past participle)
Examples:
He has never been abroad.
Have you ever been to Europe?
https://7esl.com/time-adverbs-used-with-the-present-perfect-tense/
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "C. miserable." The <span>character trait fits best the character jing mei woo from the story two kinds by amy tan is miserable.
</span>These are the following choices:
<span>A. dangerous
B. greedy
C. miserable
D. glamorous</span>
Answer:
B. Ad hominem attack
Explanation:
Fallacy can be defined as a mistaken or false belief that are based on illogical arguments or reasoning.
However, a lot of people might actually think it to be true but it isn't. There are various types of fallacy and these include; black or white, non sequitur, bandwagon, appeal to authority, straw man, and oversimplification or hasty generalization, appeal to ignorance, ad hominem, etc.
Ad hominem can be defined as a type of fallacy in which the motive, character, or some other aspect of a person is attacked rather than his or her position.
This ultimately implies that, an ad hominem is typically based on prejudices, emotions, or feelings rather than appealing to reason, intellect or substance.
In this scenario, the logical fallacy used in the above passage is an ad hominem attack. We can deduce from the passage that the speaker targeted or appealed to the grade of the opponent rather than focus on issues around being an effective class president.
Answer:
A part to whole analogy that compares two types of transportation is ''wheel is to car as motor is to boat". The way to rewrite the analogy so that it shows a whole to part relationship. is "car is to wheel as boat is to motor".
Explanation:
