Answer:
<em>Patton v. Mid-Continent Systems, Inc.</em>
Explanation:
In the framework of Patton v. Mid-Continent Systems, Inc. case (1988), Patton, and others as plaintiffs, on the one hand, and Mid-Continent Systems as the defendant entered into franchising contract. The Mid-Continent Systems were obliged to franchise truck stops run only by Patton, and others. Meanwhile, <u>the defendant violated the contract by franchising truck stops of other providers. </u>
As a result, the court decided that the plaintiff was to be awarded <em>compensatory damages</em>, and an additional $2,250,000 in <em>punitive damages</em>.
I'm pretty sure its <u>blind</u> and <u>vision lost.</u>
