1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Elina [12.6K]
3 years ago
8

In your view, is it ever acceptable to commit acts of violence against people who are in positions of power?

History
2 answers:
Dimas [21]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

no

Explanation:

you never commit acts of violence against another person regardless of who it is.

denpristay [2]3 years ago
5 0
No, violence should not be accepted
You might be interested in
Were was the dust bowl located?
BlackZzzverrR [31]

Answer: Oklahoma

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which countries had become mostly protestant by 1560
pentagon [3]

Answer:

The countries or states that were mostly Protestant in 1560 were England, Germany, Switzerland, Scotland, the Netherlands, the Baltic states, Scandinavia and Hungary.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
What does Madison like acknowledge about criticism of existing governments
tekilochka [14]
I am also having same problem .....................................................................
5 0
3 years ago
What connection does that Bible story and Dylan's song have with ethics and the so-called "Divine Command Theory" as espoused by
Darina [25.2K]

The connection is that Dylan's song ("Highway 61 Revisited") and "that Bible story" (Abraham sacrificing Isaac) both point to the ethical idea that doing the right thing means doing whatever it is that is divinely commanded.  

Explanation/context:

The origins of "Divine Command Theory" stem back to a dialogue written by Plato, which has the philosopher Socrates engaged in discussion with Euthyphro about the meaning of piety or goodness.  Socrates was being accused of impiety in Athenian court.  Impiety to the Athenians meant conduct that was displeasing to the gods.  At that same time, Euthyphro was at court in Athens to prosecute his own father for having killed a servant.  Socrates asked the kinds of questions he normally did, pressing Euthyphro how he knew that prosecuting his own father was a good thing.  Euthyphro said punishing wrongdoers for wrongdoing was the pious thing to do, no matter who the wrongdoers are.  Socrates then asked Euthyphro to how we know what "piety" is -- and Euthyphro said it was doing that which is dear to the gods.  That's the "divine command" theory in a nutshell.  Bear in mind, as the dialogue between Socrates and Euthyphro continued, there was much more nuanced thought about how well that definition works.  Socrates asked, for instance, "whether the pious or holy is beloved by the gods because it is holy, or holy because it is beloved of the gods."  That became a difficult conundrum for their consideration in the dialogue.

The Abraham story in the Bible follows the "divine command theory" idea. When God commanded Abraham to sacrifice his only son Isaac, the fact that God commanded it would make it right, according to divine command theory -- even though the act itself seemed horribly wrong.

Bob Dylan played with that idea in the lyrics to his song, "Highway 61 Revisited," from the album <em>Highway 61 Revisited </em>(1965) ...

<em>Oh, God said to Abraham, "Kill me a son"</em>

<em>Abe said, "Man, you must be puttin' me on"</em>

God said, "No" Abe say, "What?"

God say, "You can do what you want, Abe, but

The next time you see me comin', you better run"

Well, Abe said, "Where d'you want this killin' done?"

God said, "Out on Highway 61"

5 0
3 years ago
How might your view of the state of nature influence your ideas about government?
alex41 [277]

Answer:

Key to this is the concept of a social contract. This is kind of like a hypothetical agreement between subjects or citizens and an authority or a ruler. So, it's not as if we sign a piece of paper or anything like that, but rather we kind of form a contract among ourselves to maintain order. Different philosophers have different perspectives on what would happen in a state of nature. Let's talk about three major philosophers who wrote about the idea of a state of nature.

8 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • Which identifies the effects of the Congress of Vienna?
    13·2 answers
  • Ida<br> b. wells was best known for her involvement in which movement?
    15·1 answer
  • Under Louis XV, France fought against all the following nations/countries except for which one? Question 2 options: North Americ
    6·1 answer
  • Which emperor, son of Vespasian, was a strong political leader and was thought of as a fair leader?
    10·2 answers
  • BRAINLIESTTT ASAP!!! :)<br><br> -What Was the Result of Indian Independence?
    13·2 answers
  • What did muhammed’s first revelation from the angel
    12·2 answers
  • Name three African American Artists who won the National Medal of the Arts in the 1980s
    14·1 answer
  • 22. How many governments in exile based themselves in London in World War II?
    15·2 answers
  • 1. The framers of the Constitution strove to create a political system that protected Americans from the abuses of government. E
    11·1 answer
  • In your words, explain the difference between political cartoons and propaganda.
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!