Answer: 15 kilometers per mile
Explanation: Duh
Explanation:
Maintain a favorable balance of trade for Great Britain with its colonies
(1). Woodrow Wilson. His basic ideal was to avoid global conflict.
(2). Paul von Hindenburg. He was a Prussian general. Hindenburg led a German army to a complete success at the Battle of Tannenburg.
(3). Tsar Nicholas II. He was the last remaining Russian emperor. Tsar Nicholas II was the one who approved Russia's entry in WWI.
(4). Winston Churchill. The first lord of the Admiralty. He resigned in 1915 because of his unsuccessful role in the Gallipoli campaign.
(5). Kaiser Wilhelm II. He was the last German emperor.
There are many more important people in WWI, But here is a few. I hope this helps.
Have a wonderful rest of the day.
In order to paraphrase a text you should understand each paragraph's main ideas and then think of other citations and examples of your own to complete the logic of it.
1 - The Beard interpretation has two main problems: first, there isn’t in the Constitution any confession or strong sign of the influence from those who believed the fundamental private rights of property being fundamentally anterior to government and morally unreachable for the popular majorities; second, it is impossible to deny the Constitution as a document in federalism.
2 - These problems should be addressed. The second is simple for it is consensual amongst Revolutionary era historians that the big question of that moment was: how to articulate diverse parts of an empire towards common purposes? And how to realize that articulation without taking one side more than another, without transforming demands for liberty and autonomy into central government undermining. It can be argued that’s the same debate over Federal aid to education.
3 - The Declaratory Act was a declaration of the British failure in solving this same problem, about which Edmund Burke sharply observed the impossibility of arguing anyone into slavery. When it was time for Americans to deal with this dilemma the Articles of Confederation were adequate when discussing the distribution of powers but lacking in sanctions. This deficiency was the cause of the Philadelphia Convention.
4 - Although Beard’s interpretation is convincing when arguing that those who wrote the Constitution belonged to the propertied classes, he is not as convincing about this being reflected on the Constitution itself. If the framers were trying to protect their property they didn’t succeed. Our analysis of the Economic Interpretation of the Constitution shows that the auteur’s reading of that historical moment fails to legitimate itself when confronted with the Constitution’s text. What each of the framers did after the Constitution and how it was directly linked to his class isn’t enough proof of the auteur’s argument if it isn’t shown also through the Constitution.
Well even though im not writing the two paragraphs for you, Im going yo give you info about one of the cases so that you can do the paragraphs. Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) Gibbons v. Ogden is considered a landmark supreme court case on the issue of the Interstate Commerce Clause. Aaron Ogden was given an exclusive license to operate a shipping business within the State of New York. He sued a man named Thomas Gibbons, who ran a competing shipping business between New Jersey and New York City, claiming that Gibbon's operations in the State of New York were illegal.<span>The case went all the way to the Supreme Court, which ruled in favor of Thomas Gibbons. Hope this works good for you. </span>
