Step-by-step explanation:
I'll help if you'd like
Answer:
(-1.5,0) (0,1)
Step-by-step explanation:
used desmos
Question:
Yuet solved the equation
for a.
Her steps are shown below.
1. Subtract 2b: 
2. Divide by 6: 
Answer:
In step 1 she needed to add 2b to both sides of the equation.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given:
The above steps shows how Yuet solved an equation
Required:
True statement about Yuet's work
The implication of the statement is to state what Yuet should have done instead of what she did.
In step 1, she subtracted 2b from both sides of the equation; this is wrong.
Instead of subtracting, she ought to add 2b to both sides of the equation.
The correct steps and result is as follows:
1. Add 2b: 
2. Divide by 6: 
Hence, we can conclude that in step 1 she needed to add 2b to both sides of the equation.
It's not rigid because dilations (scale factor not equal to 1) change the length of the segments, or the distances between the points. You'll get a similar figure but it won't be congruent. For example, if the scale factor is 3, then the distances will be three times as large; or the lengths will be 3 times as long.
To be "rigid", the lengths must be kept the same. In contrast, a reflection is rigid because the distances are kept the same. The only thing changing is the orientation (clockwise to counter-clockwise, or vice versa).