truthfully both, but the economy was driven up north when they used the resources from the south and became factory driven. The civil war definetely divided the country on northern technology and ideals. after slavery was outlawed, northern technology was used on farms.
Answer:
Treaty of Brest-Litovsk.
Explanation:
The political caricature of the document referred to in the question was published in a London newspaper after the Russian-German Armistice of 1917. The cartoon refers to this agreement, in which Russia, under the leadership of Vladimir Lenin, ended its involvement in the First War World War and Russia's withdrawal from the war would later be formalized in the 1918 Treaty of Brest-Litovsk.
No, it was not moral because it disrupts what they are already trying to fix. When the people come to take over, the people have no more freedom, they have to listen the people that take over. And the people that take over want money, resources, and land, so that makes it even worse for them because of the fact that they are going through all of their resources, and losing their land faster making them even more poor. Sometimes it isn't morally a good thing because many people can get killed or that the empire does not care about the country's health. Hope this helps! Have a good day.
<span>
</span>
Answer:
Education in the nation's schools focused more on science and math.
Explanation:
that the anwser C) Education in the nation's schools focused more on science and math.
