The 2000 presidential election was extremely tight. When the votes had been counted, the democratic side demanded a recount in Florida. This election was quite unique because the recount lasted much longer than expected. This forced the Supreme Court to take a stand, and the court eventually decided that the Florida votes went to George W. Bush. Because of this, he won the election with 271 electoral votes--one more than what was needed to win the electoral college.
In your opinion, would you say that this demonstrated the strength and resiliency of American democracy? This is what your assignment asks, and from this point forward, it's all your opinion :)
Winfield's 'game plan' was to very carefully scout out the locations of
Santa Ana's forces, then trying to aneak his army around them, and
attacking from the rear. A certain Captain Robert E. Lee was his most
important scout and strategist. Winfield's biggest frustration was those
of his generals who ignored the above 'game plan', and went charging
right into the enemy guns, which Santa Ana had carefully set up to fire
on all roads leading to his army.
Well, the credibility gap caused a huge amount of distrust from the people toward the government due to the "coverups" the gov. gave about the Vietnam war. It is difficult to try to run a country when the country doesn't trust its leader. If you are questioning the diagram, you just need to draw the diagram and write the causes leading to the fall in support for the Vietnam War effort. Hope I helped!
The war didn’t concern the United States and it was important for them to stay out of entangling alliances (pacifism)
Diversity and and trade routes
In the middle ages, Europe is in perpetual warfare. Many Lords live in fortresses to protect themselves against enemies or allies alike. It is an age of no life assurance unless you are protected by strong vassals. Vassals are people<span> in a subordinate position to another in exchange of land and favor.
The life of knights and nobles demonstrate the importance of warfare in the middle ages by conducting rigorous military trainings among themselves, by enlisting children to military services until they become fit for military purposes, by living in fortresses, by maintaing close allegiances, by having vassals to protect them in trying times, and by sensationalizing warfare and making it seem acceptable by justifying it as a means of survival but in reality, it's just the nobles who are truly in conflict themselves, vassal lords just find themselves in wars if their pledged lords found themselves in conflict.</span>
