1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
dezoksy [38]
2 years ago
9

Why has it been important to keep natural habitats such as the Great Plains free from wildfires?

Law
2 answers:
nataly862011 [7]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

5,386

Explanation:

Nikitich [7]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

it is because they are home to many species. if they were to get on fire, a lot of animals would lose their habitats and lose food sources. this could lead to the extinction of many animals and the loss of potential medicinal plants

You might be interested in
contracts for the sale of fabric, automobiles, computers, furniture, and paper clips would all be governed by Article 2 of the U
leva [86]

Answer:

The answer is True

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is a good indication that a website information is questionable
Lina20 [59]

A website is an online source which is responsible for the data content it has and some websites are questionable, while some others are verifiable.

<h3>Questionable Website</h3>

With this in mind, the following are characteristics to know a questionable website:

  • They post personal opinions
  • They do not use facts
  • They are biased
  • They do not post truthful information

<h3>Credible Website</h3>

The characteristics of a credible website include:

  • They post factual information
  • They are either a government owned or scholarly website.
  • They do not use personal opinion over facts

Read more about website integrity here:

brainly.com/question/3733655

5 0
2 years ago
Explain one of the options for proposing an Amendment.
mixas84 [53]

Answer:

Article V of the Constitution provides two ways to propose amendments to the document. Amendments may be proposed either by the Congress, through a joint resolution passed by a two-thirds vote, or by a convention called by Congress in response to applications from two-thirds of the state legislatures.

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Challenges of separation of power
Scrat [10]
In several Supreme Court decisions this decade, the question of whether a constitutional attack on a statute should be considered “as applied” to the actual facts of the case before the Court or “on the face” of the statute has been a difficult preliminary issue for the Court. The issue has prompted abundant academic discussion. Recently, scholars have noted a preference within the Roberts Court for as-applied constitutional challenges. However, the cases cited as evidence for the Roberts Court’s preference for as-applied challenges all involve constitutional challenges which concede the legislative power to enact the provision but nevertheless argue for unconstitutionality because the statute intrudes upon rights or liberties protected by the Constitution. Of course, this is not the only type of constitutional challenge to a statute; some constitutional challenges attack the underlying power of the legislative branch to pass the statute in question. Modern scholarship, however, as well as the Supreme Court, has mostly ignored the difference between these two different types of constitutional challenges to statutes when discussing facial and as-applied constitutional challenges. In glossing over this difference, considerations which fundamentally affect whether a facial or as-applied challenge is appropriate have gone unnoticed. By clearly distinguishing between these two very different types of constitutional challenges, and the respective role of a federal court in adjudicating each of these challenges, a new perspective can be gained on the exceedingly difficult question of when a facial or as-applied challenge to a statute is appropriate. In this Article, I argue that federal courts are constitutionally compelled to consider the constitutionality of a statute on its face when the power of Congress to pass the law has been challenged. Under the separation of powers principles enunciated in I.N.S. v. Chadha and Clinton v. New York, federal courts are not free to ignore the “finely wrought” procedures described in the Constitution for the creation of federal law by “picking and choosing” constitutional applications from unconstitutional applications of the federal statute, at least when the statute has been challenged as exceeding Congress’s enumerated powers in the Constitution. The separation of powers principles of I.N.S. and Clinton, which preclude a “legislative veto” or an executive “line item veto,” should similarly preclude a “judicial application veto” of a law that has been challenged as exceeding Congress’s Constitutional authority.
6 0
3 years ago
(BRAINLIEST PLS HELP ME )
kvv77 [185]

Answer: Poison, sperm, lead, microbes from bodies of water, and drugs. Thats all i can think of but im sure there is alot more

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was partly responsible for the trials of alger hiss and the rosenbergs?
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following is NOT intellectual property ?
    7·1 answer
  • Why are the trees green
    15·2 answers
  • Student Information
    13·1 answer
  • This Constitutional Clause Concerns The... (Article I, Section 8, U.S Constitution)
    11·1 answer
  • Grounds on which the registrar of a partnership business may lawfully refuse to register a partnership
    15·1 answer
  • Fill the gaps with appropriate word(s) or phrases
    15·1 answer
  • What policy/policies impact your life?
    10·1 answer
  • Harper is legally arrested for shoplifting. In the patrol car on the way to the station the officer asks
    5·2 answers
  • " If you have been arrested on suspicion of DUI you can only be released after A. " you have been held for a minimum of 8 hours
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!