Answer:
Killing should never really be considered to be justified whether in a work of fiction or not; however, Rainsford was in a position of kill or be killed. The whole thing is a case of kill or be killed, essentially self defense. I guess it depends on how you view that type of thing, but in my opinion, if Rainsford had not killed Zaroff, then he would have undoubtedly died. Therefore, yes I believe he was justified in his decision.
As with all interpretive questions, your answer is based upon your own reading of the story and how you analyze the plot and characters. Rainsford had escaped Zaroff, and won the game. There was no reason to return to the masion and kill Zaroff except to exact revenge. Consider that Rainsford himself is a hunter, used to being in power. Although he had never considered doing something as inhumane as Zaroff in hunting humans, his choice to kill Zaroff reveals his need to be in control. In this case, his killing of Zaroff isn't about justice, but about revenge.
On the other hand, there is nothing to suggest Zaroff would have quit hunting humans. He was a static character, who didn't change even when he "lost" the hunt of Rainsford. In this reading, the audience can interpret that Rainsford is doing his part for mankind by eliminating the threat of the murderer Zaroff. After all, on this island, there is no justice system by which to prosecute him.
You will need to choose the answer that best supports your understanding of the characters.
This symbolizes the obstacles that people face in real life because if you think about it like this you cannot write a essay without writing utensils so therefore in order to get through you must face your challenges in order to live life hope that was good enough for you!
The one which has following has an unreliable narrator is You think you know everything, don’t you? You think you are so smart up there on your high horse. You love to look down on people. You love to judge people. You are just the worst. So don’t think I care about you. I am going to ignore you and go along with my plan. So I will be the ruler of this world soon, and you will bow down to my power. The best part is you cannot stop me. My plan is perfect and so shall the world. Thus the correct answer is D.
<h3>What is a narrator?</h3>
A narrator refers as a person who conveys or portrays the story. He may or may not be the author as the author is one who writes any stores wherever the narrator is the person who narrates the thought as a third person in the story.
The most common application of an unreliable narrator is in first-person narratives since they are untrustworthy storytellers. Readers are really being encouraged to doubt the narrator's authority as a storyteller by the unreliable narration. This kind of narrator offers confusing tales and inadequate explanations.
Therefore, option D is the appropriate answer.
Learn more about the narrator, here:
brainly.com/question/12020368
#SPJ5
Answer:
just say if u dont know him/her very well then just write that down.
Explanation:
because if u have trouble like that then u need to ask we are here for u.
Iiiudduhdebdgebwbw ehesbebbw hw
