Answer:
a. The fewer risk factors the better, so their unborn child is likely to be better off even with the limited help the social worker provided.
Explanation:
According to a different source, these are the options that come with this question:
a. The fewer risk factors the better, so their unborn child is likely to be better off even with the limited help the social worker provided.
b. Their unborn child is not likely to be benefited by eliminating only one risk factor.
c. The unborn child might have been benefited if prenatal care were found, but improving prenatal nutrition is not important.
d. The health care and stress factors will only be important after the child is born.
In this example, the social worker is not able to help Robert and Nadine with all their problems. The couple still needs to find work and prenatal care. However, the social worker was able to help them find enough food to eat. Although the baby still faces some risks, the fewer risks, the better. Therefore, he is still better off than he was before thanks to the limited help of the social worker.
This sounds like a homework assignment, not a question! :) :)
Your answer is correct they report to the governor.
They migrated to India or the u.s
People deprecate assault because for them, assaults to religious, learned and civil institutions, is also assaults to the property.
Ralph Waldo Emerson detailed in his essay, "Self-Reliance", that men have esteem the religious, learned and civil institutions as guards of property. Thus, assault to these are assault to property. Their esteem is measured by what they have, and not what they are.