Well, Britain made everybody be the same religion as the king or queen, so we had no freedom of religion. We felt very restricted. They imposed too many taxes since they were in debt after the French and Indian War, like the Stamp act and Tea Act. And also, Britain required its residents to house British troops and their supplies, which was totally rude. Overall, Britain impacted the colonies negatively. Hope this helps (:
Ok so step 2, Does Lincoln think that we can continue to have some slave states and some free states. Lincoln wanted freedom in ALL states. he wanted to abolish slavery and he was against it. He knows that there cannot be a agreement so he says <span>I believe this government cannot endure permanently half-slave and half-free. he he says he doesn't think the government has a say so in this even though he wants all free states.
</span><span>Does Douglas think we can continue to have some slave states and some free states?
he's saying that </span><span>each State being left free to decide for itself. SO in other words, he says that it's shouldn't be up to the gov, but up to the states.
i don't really know much about the part where is says. </span><span>Tell me about a historic idea that supports Douglas’ point of view on this. but i </span>hope that was some help, let me know if u have questions.
Answer: a
Explanation:
An indenture is a legal contract that reflects or covers a debt or purchase obligation. It specifically refers to two types of practices: in historical usage, an indentured servant status, and in modern usage, it is an instrument used for commercial debt or real estate transaction.
An indentured servant or indentured laborer is an employee (indenture) within a system of unfree labor who is bound by a signed or forced contract (indenture) to work for a particular employer for a fixed time. The contract often lets the employer sell the labor of an indenturee to a third party.
Answer: M. The Judicial branch determined whether or not laws were to be executed.
Explanation: Marshall is making a point that it's up to the courts not to politicians to decide what is and what isn't constitutional. Prior to the Supreme Court's landmark ruling in Marbury v. Madison 1803, the judicial branch of government was extraordinarily weak. It could interpret the law but did not have the final say on whether a specific law was constitutional or not.
Most oil in the world? ♀️♀️♀️♀️♀️
