<span>In Roman society, the aristocrats were known as patricians. The highest positions in the government were held by two consuls, or leaders, who ruled the Roman Republic. A senate composed of patricians elected these consuls. At this time, lower-class citizens, or plebeians, had virtually no say in the government.
Hope my answer helped :)</span>
It would be "d. monarchy vs. representative government," that did not cause arguments at the Constitutional Convention, since all of the representatives knew that there should be a representative government of some sort. <span />
English civil war, may flower compact, Bicameral Legislatures, royal colonies, town meetings, town government, county government, confederation, fundamental orders. I think that’s all of them
The answer will be as a oligarchy
Reduces their power--elites in Latin America control economic and political aspects of society. Reforms would provide more groups with rights, reducing the influence of the elite.
In any country, elites often control the means of production and the political system. Reforms, especially coming from lower classes or oppressed groups, would potentially reduce the power and influence the elite group has. This has been true through many revolutionary movements.
