1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Fittoniya [83]
4 years ago
10

Why did the Supreme Court refuse to allow the appointment of the last judges? Marbury V. Madison

History
1 answer:
gregori [183]4 years ago
5 0
The Supreme Court had no power to ensure the appointment of the last judges because the law that allowed citizens to bring a case directly to the Supreme Court was ruled unconstitutional.

In this case, William Marbury brought his case directly to the Supreme Court which is extremely unusual. However, at the time it was legal to take this action as long as it dealt with a "writ of mandamus". This phrase means that a court can demand an action from a government official.

Though it was legal at the time, the Supreme Court ruled that this law made by Congress was unconstitutional, leaving them powerless in helping William Marbury.
You might be interested in
How might the world have been different if Alexander the Great had lived longer?
SVEN [57.7K]

Answer:

He might have conquered more land and spread Greek culture into Asia. Could have had the biggest empire the world had ever seen.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which group urged Southern secession?
morpeh [17]
Fire-eaters............................................................................................
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
were HUAC and senator McCarthy justified in investigating people who were suspected of being communists
alexandr402 [8]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although there are no options attached we can say the following.

No. The House Committee on Un-American Activities (HUAC) and senator McCarthywere not justified in investigating people who were suspected of being communists.

What Senator McCarthy basically did was to accuse many members of the United States federal government and the US military, but he never showed any valid evic¿dence that supported his accusations.

We are referring to Wisconsin Republican Senator Joseph McCarthy who accused many that many people of supporting Communist activities in the mid-1950s. McCarthy just accused people but never offer a serious argument or proof, so he ended up being a liar and his political career ended.

4 0
3 years ago
Which state joined the Confederacy?
fredd [130]

Answer:

I'm 99% sure the answer is D. Virginia

6 0
3 years ago
What amendment is this? An army base in North Carolina experiences
mario62 [17]

Answer: The 3rd Amendment

Explanation: The third amendment states this: "No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law."

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Choose all that apply.
    14·2 answers
  • Describe the results of the compromise of 1850
    9·1 answer
  • Match each event to the correct step in the decision-making process. 1. A woman is considering running for city council. Step On
    7·1 answer
  • Why did we want the Gadsden purchase land?
    15·1 answer
  • Which statement best describes the situation in the United States after the holocast
    10·1 answer
  • What actions taken by the Nazis prevented Jewish people from leaving Germany?
    7·1 answer
  • Why is Mustafa Kemal Ataturk important to the history of Turkey? (extra points)
    13·1 answer
  • The author draw<br> What connection<br> loe<br> between hoppers<br> gender and her<br> career?
    14·1 answer
  • What are the ways in which Native Americans told their stories?
    10·1 answer
  • Which group tended to support the Loyalists?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!