1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Aliun [14]
3 years ago
6

A parachutist whose mass is 75kg drops from a helicopter hovering 4000m above the ground and falls toward the earth under the in

fluence of gravity. Assume the gravitational force is constant. Assume also that the force due to the air resistance is proportional to the velocity of the parachutist with the proportionality constant b_1 = 15N sec/m when the chute is close and b_2 = 105N sec/m when the chute is open. If the chute does open 1 min after the parachutist leaves the helicopter after how many seconds will he hit the ground?
Mathematics
1 answer:
Llana [10]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

the parachutist hits the ground at t= 211.43 sec

Step-by-step explanation:

from Newton's second law:

Force = m*g - b*v = m*dv/dt

∫dt = ∫dv/(g - b/m*v) = - (m/b) ln (g - b/m*v) +C

t = - (m/b) ln (g - b/m*v) +C

assuming that he starts at rest (when he jumps) for t =0 → v=0

0 = - (m/b) ln (g - b/m*0) +C → C=(m/b) ln g

thus

t = (m/b) ln [g/(g - b/m*v)]

e^(b/m*t) = g/(g - b/m*v)

e^-(b/m*t) = 1- b/(m*g)*v

v= m*g/b [1-e^-(b/m*t) ]

then

dh/dt=v

∫dh = ∫v * dt = v=  ∫ m*g/b [1-e^-(b/m*t) ] dt =  m*g/b*[t + m/b *e^-(b/m*t)]

h = m*g/b*[t + m/b *e^-(b/m*t)]

then

a) before it opens b₁= 15N sec/m , thus

h = 75*9.8/15*[ 60 + 75/15 *e^-(15/75*60)] = 2940 m

b) after if opens  b₂= 105N sec/m , thus for the remaining meters

4000 - 2940 = 75*9.8/105*[ t + 75/105 *e^-(105/75*t)] =

since the equation is not linear we can neglect the exponencial term ( assume that reaches fast the terminal velocity since b is high), then

4000 - 2940 = 75*9.8/105* t

t= 151.43 sec

then to prove our assumption

additional distance neglected = 75/105 *e^-(105/75*151.43 )] = 2,36*10⁻³⁷ m ≈ 0

then our assumption is right

thus total time is

t total =  60 sec + 151.43 sec = 211.43 sec

therefore the parachutist hits the ground at t= 211.43 sec

You might be interested in
Select ALL the correct answers,
Margaret [11]

Answer:

The second and third

Step-by-step explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
<img src="https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7B5%7D%7B2%7D%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7Bx%20-%204%7D%7B3%7D" id="TexFormula1" title="\frac{5}{
valentina_108 [34]

Step-by-step explanation:

\frac{5}{2}  =  \frac{x - 4}{3}

3 \times \frac{5}{2}  =  \frac{x - 4}{3}

\frac{3}{1}  \times  \frac{5}{2}  =  \frac{x - 4}{3}

cross multiplication

\frac{6 \times 5}{2}  =  \frac{x - 4}{3}

15 =  \frac{x - 4}{3}

15 \times 3 = x - 4

45 + 4 = x

49 = x

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Suppose each of the following data sets is a simple random sample from some population. For each dataset, make a normal QQ plot.
adell [148]

Answer:

a) For this case the histogram is not too skewed and we can say that is approximately symmetrical so then we can conclude that this dataset is similar to a normal distribution

b) For this case the data is skewed to the left and we can't assume that we have the normality assumption.

c) This last case the histogram is not symmetrical and the data seems to be skewed.

Step-by-step explanation:

For this case we have the following data:

(a)data = c(7,13.2,8.1,8.2,6,9.5,9.4,8.7,9.8,10.9,8.4,7.4,8.4,10,9.7,8.6,12.4,10.7,11,9.4)

We can use the following R code to get the histogram

> x1<-c(7,13.2,8.1,8.2,6,9.5,9.4,8.7,9.8,10.9,8.4,7.4,8.4,10,9.7,8.6,12.4,10.7,11,9.4)

> hist(x1,main="Histogram a)")

The result is on the first figure attached.

For this case the histogram is not too skewed and we can say that is approximately symmetrical so then we can conclude that this dataset is similar to a normal distribution

(b)data = c(2.5,1.8,2.6,-1.9,1.6,2.6,1.4,0.9,1.2,2.3,-1.5,1.5,2.5,2.9,-0.1)

> x2<- c(2.5,1.8,2.6,-1.9,1.6,2.6,1.4,0.9,1.2,2.3,-1.5,1.5,2.5,2.9,-0.1)

> hist(x2,main="Histogram b)")

The result is on the first figure attached.

For this case the data is skewed to the left and we can't assume that we have the normality assumption.

(c)data = c(3.3,1.7,3.3,3.3,2.4,0.5,1.1,1.7,12,14.4,12.8,11.2,10.9,11.7,11.7,11.6)

> x3<-c(3.3,1.7,3.3,3.3,2.4,0.5,1.1,1.7,12,14.4,12.8,11.2,10.9,11.7,11.7,11.6)

> hist(x3,main="Histogram c)")

The result is on the first figure attached.

This last case the histogram is not symmetrical and the data seems to be skewed.

7 0
3 years ago
Can someone pls help me
Verizon [17]

Answer:

i think the answer is \frac{x}{2.1} \leq 4

Step-by-step explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
What is the solution to the following system of linear equations?
Arturiano [62]

Answer:

i think it's B, no solutions

Step-by-step explanation:

because they are parallel to each other

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • PLEASE CHECK MY MATH ANSWERS PLEASE AND LABEL THEM LIKE 1.WRONG AND STUFF THANKS !
    12·2 answers
  • 32.76 is what percent of 10.5
    14·2 answers
  • Students and faculty raised $6042 for band uniforms. The faculty raised $1780. Write an equation you can use to find the amount
    6·1 answer
  • What is 160 broken down into prime numbers
    6·1 answer
  • Is 100 lbs heavier than 2 tons
    11·1 answer
  • -5 &gt;3 true or false plssssss answer
    11·1 answer
  • Pl3sssssssssssssssssssssssssssss
    14·1 answer
  • Answer and explain for brainliest, no links..
    6·1 answer
  • NEED HELP WILL MARK BRANLYEST
    14·1 answer
  • If p is the hypothesis of a conditional statement and
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!