Ask question

Ask question

All categories

2 years ago

13

Lower-than-expected demand for LCD TVs has spurred manufacturers to cut prices in recent years. The average price P of a 32-in.

LCD TV t years after can be approximated by P(t)(), where t0 corresponds to .

1 answer:

Rina8888 [55]2 years ago

6 0

Complete question :

Lower-than-expected demand for LCD TVs has spurred manufacturers to cut prices in recent years. The average price P of a 32-in. LCD TV t years after 2005 can be approximated by P(t) 1052(0.793), where t0 corresponds to 2005 a) What was the average price of an LCD TV in 2005? in 2009? in 2011?

Answer:

1052 ; 416.01 ; 261.61

Step-by-step explanation:

Given the price function :

P(t) = t0(0.793)^t

P(t) = 1052(0.793)^t

Price in 2005 = 1052

The average price of LCD in 2005 is t0

t - t0 = 2005 - 2005 = 0

P(0) = 1052(0.793)^0 ;

P(0) = 1052 * 1 =

Price in 2005 = 1052

Price in 2009 :

t = 2009 - 2005 = 4

P(t) = t0(0.793)^t

P(4) = 1052(0.793)^4

P(4) = 1052 * 0.39534 = 416.0145

Price of LCD in 2009 = 416.01

Price in 2011

t = 2011 - 2005 = 6

P(t) = t0(0.793)^t

P(6) = 1052(0.793)^6

P(6) = 1052 * 0.248679 = 261.6103

Price of LCD in 2009 = 261.61

You might be interested in

Drag the tiles to the correct boxes to complete the pairs. Not all tiles will be used. Consider the functions given below. SEE F

Wewaii [24]

Answer:

1. $P(x)$ ÷ $Q(x)$ ---> $\frac{-3x + 2}{3(3x - 1)}$

2. $P(x) + Q(x)$ ---> $\frac{2(6x - 1)}{(3x - 1)(-3x + 2)}$

3. $P(x) - Q(x)$ ---> $\frac{-2(12x - 5)}{(3x - 1)(-3x + 2)}$

4. $P(x)*Q(x)$ --> $\frac{12}{(3x - 1)(-3x + 2)}$

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that:

1. $P(x) = \frac{2}{3x - 1}$

$Q(x) = \frac{6}{-3x + 2}$

Thus,

$P(x)$ ÷ $Q(x)$ = $\frac{2}{3x - 1}$ ÷ $\frac{6}{-3x + 2}$

Flip the 2nd function, Q(x), upside down to change the process to multiplication.

$\frac{2}{3x - 1}*\frac{-3x + 2}{6}$

$\frac{2(-3x + 2)}{6(3x - 1)}$

$= \frac{-3x + 2}{3(3x - 1)}$

2. $P(x) + Q(x)$ = $\frac{2}{3x - 1} + \frac{6}{-3x + 2}$

Make both expressions as a single fraction by finding, the common denominator, divide the common denominator by each denominator, and then multiply by the numerator. You'd have the following below:

$\frac{2(-3x + 2) + 6(3x - 1)}{(3x - 1)(-3x + 2)}$

$\frac{-6x + 4 + 18x - 6}{(3x - 1)(-3x + 2)}$

$\frac{-6x + 18x + 4 - 6}{(3x - 1)(-3x + 2)}$

$\frac{12x - 2}{(3x - 1)(-3x + 2)}$

$= \frac{2(6x - 1}{(3x - 1)(-3x + 2)}$

3. $P(x) - Q(x)$ = $\frac{2}{3x - 1} - \frac{6}{-3x + 2}$

$\frac{2(-3x + 2) - 6(3x - 1)}{(3x - 1)(-3x + 2)}$

$\frac{-6x + 4 - 18x + 6}{(3x - 1)(-3x + 2)}$

$\frac{-6x - 18x + 4 + 6}{(3x - 1)(-3x + 2)}$

$\frac{-24x + 10}{(3x - 1)(-3x + 2)}$

$= \frac{-2(12x - 5}{(3x - 1)(-3x + 2)}$

4. $P(x)*Q(x) = \frac{2}{3x - 1}* \frac{6}{-3x + 2}$

$P(x)*Q(x) = \frac{2*6}{(3x - 1)(-3x + 2)}$

$P(x)*Q(x) = \frac{12}{(3x - 1)(-3x + 2)}$

4 0

3 years ago

Simplify.<br><br> (0.4n)(16n)

BigorU [14]

=(0.4n)(16n)
multiply 0.4 & 16 and n & n
=(0.4*16)(n * n)
=6.4n^2

Hope this helps! :)

4 0

3 years ago

31/40 in simplest form

I am Lyosha [343]

Answer:

31/40

Step-by-step explanation:

It cannot be reduced anymore. It is already in simplest form.

5 0

3 years ago

Choose the congruence theorem that you would use to prove the triangles congruent.

Elena L [17]

<u><em>Answer:</em></u>

SAS

<u><em>Explanation:</em></u>

<u>Before solving the problem, let's define each of the given theorems:</u>

<u>1- SSS (side-side-side):</u> This theorem is valid when the three sides of the first triangle are congruent to the corresponding three sides in the second triangle

<u>2- SAS (side-angle-side):</u> This theorem is valid when two sides and the included angle between them in the first triangle are congruent to the corresponding two sides and the included angle between them in the second triangle

<u>3- ASA (angle-side-angle):</u> This theorem is valid when two angles and the included side between them in the first triangle are congruent to the corresponding two angles and the included side between them in the second triangle

<u>4- AAS (angle-angle-side):</u> This theorem is valid when two angles and a side that is not included between them in the first triangle are congruent to the corresponding two angles and a side that is not included between them in the second triangle

<u>Now, let's check the given triangles:</u>

We can note that the two sides and the included angle between them in the first triangle are congruent to the corresponding two sides and the included angle between them in the second triangle

This means that the two triangles are congruent by <u>SAS</u> theorem

Hope this helps :)

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A hexagonal pyramid is cut by a plane as shown in the diagram. What is the shape of the resulting cross section? see diagram

Alenkasestr [34]

From the diagram you can see that plane cuts each lateral face of hexagonal pyramid and do not cut the base. A hexagonal pyramid has six lateral faces. The intersection of each of these lateral faces with given cutting plane is segment. The figure which consists of these segments is hexagon. This hexagon is not the same as base and even is not similar to the base because the cutting plane is not parallel to the base.

Answer: resulting cross section is a hexagon, correct choice is option 4.

9 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers