Alex's country was once communist, but now allows limited private ownership of companies, and lets market forces determine production and pricing decision is the kind of 'Market Socialist' economy.
Market socialism, sometimes known as liberal socialism, is an economic system that strikes a balance between free enterprise and socialist planning. In this system, businesses are publicly owned, but output and consumption are determined by the market rather than by governmental planning.
In real life, Market socialism components have been present in a number of different economies. A version of market-based socialism, based on socially owned cooperatives, workers' self-management, and market allocation of capital, is usually regarded as having existed in the former Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia.
To learn more about Communist
brainly.com/question/14018486
#SPJ4
Answer:
The debit to the retained earning should be $750,000 for this transaction because that is the market value of the asset to be distributed as dividend.
Explanation:
Property dividend is a form of dividend payout that involves distribution of company`s assets to equity holders as a form of return. These assets can be inventory, marketable securities or investment in a subsidiary.
For this distribution to be formal, it must be approved by the board of directors of the company. After approved and declared, the accounting entries can now be passed.
The accounting entries needed are:
Debit: Retained Earnings with the amount of the asset distributed.
Credit: Dividend Payable with the amount of the asset distributed.
It is important to note that the market value of asset to be distributed should be considered i.e the market value of the asset must be recognized in the book. The difference in book value and market value of the investment will be recognized in respective asset ledger account prior transfer to retained earnings.So that the market value of the investment is recognized on the debit side of retained earnings
In the case of Fitzgerald, $750,000 will be debited to retained earnings since it is the market value of the asset to be distributed.
Answer:
The correct answer is 10.72% ( Approx.).
Explanation:
According to the scenario, the given data are as follows:
Debt ratio = 46.5%
Capital intensity ratio = 2.51 times
Profit margins = 21%
Dividend payout = 38%
Formula to calculate sustainable growth rate ae as follows:
Sustainable growth rate = (Earnings retention rate × Return on equity ) / ( 1 - (ROE × RR)
where, Retention rate =(1 - dividend payout rate)
= (1-0.38) = 0.62
ROE = Profit margin × Total asset turonver × Equity multipler
= Profit margin × 1/capital intensity ratio × 1/(1-debt ratio)
= .21 × (1/2.51) × 1/(1-.465)
= .21 × 0.398 × 1.869
= 0.1562
=15.62%
So, Sustainable growth rate = (0.1562*0.62) / 1 - (0.1562*0.62)
= 0.096844 / 0.903156
= 0.1072
= 10.72% (approx.)
Hence, the correct answer is 10.72% (approx.).
Answer:
INCREASE the consumption of Pepsi and REDUCE the consumption of Hamburger
Explanation:
Based on the information given we were told that Bill uses his whole budget to purchase the following :
5 cans of Pepsi
3 Hamburgers per week
And the following were the price:
Pepsi costs $1 per can
Hamburger cost $2
Bill marginal utility:
Pepsi 4
Hamburgers 6
Based on the above details this means that Bill could increase his utility by INCREASING Pepsi consumption and REDUCING hamburger consumption reason been that 5 cans of Pepsi costs $1 per can which will gives us income of $5 ($5×1) while 3 Hamburgers per week cost $2 which will give us income of $6 ($3×2) which typically means that the Hamburgers has more income that Pepsi.
Secondly since the marginal utility for Pepsi is 4 while that of Hamburgers is 6 which means that Hamburgers has higher MARGINAL UTILITY than that of Pepsi because the consumption of Hamburgers is higher than the consumption of Pepsi.
Therefore the best thing that Bill could do in order to increase his Pepsi utility is for Bill to increase Pepsi consumption and reduce hamburger consumption.
Answer:
A gain of $16,100
Explanation:
When the amount received from the disposal of an asset is higher than the carrying value of the asset, the company makes a gain on disposal.
The carrying amount of an asset is the difference between the cost of the asset and the accumulated depreciation of the asset.
Carrying amount
= $22,000 - $6,600
= $15,400
Gain/(loss) on sale of asset
= $31,500 - $15,400
= $16,100
