Mother and lee founded the Shaker sect in england and moved to america in 1774, starting a movement that spread to communal societies from maine to indiana and Kentucky.
A communal society is one in which anyone lives and works collectively and assets and possessions are shared rather than being owned with the aid of a selected individual.
A communal society is a super type or concept of society that is absolutely cohesive—morally, religiously, politically, and socially—due to the small numbers and isolated country of the people, due to the especially unmediated private first-class of social interplay, and due to the fact the complete global of enjoying.
Communal society is something shared or decided by using all individuals of a given community. when there's a closet complete with garments that belong to absolutely everyone in a group, that is an example of a closet that would be defined as a communal closet.
Learn more about Communal society here:
brainly.com/question/15185046
#SPJ4
Answer:d. indirect benefits to the reader
Explanation:The indirect effects to the reader are the not so obvious benefits but they are very important for example a person who reads often may find that their English langauge skills have improved such that they develop comprehension skills , reading skills and the overall understanding of the Langauge.
Answer:
e. None of the above
Explanation:
In economics, positive statements consist of objective statements that individuals can put into test, amend, or reject by referring to the accessible evidence. Positive economics handles unbiased explanation and both testing and refusal of theories. In this case, none of the examples represent a positive statement.
Answer: a. What motivates people.
Explanation:
According to the doctrine of Psychologism Egoism, people are always motivated to act following their own interests, meaning that all human motivation is egoistic. This theory, therefore, is about what motivates people´s actions. Is not about what is good and right, as the motivation is considered ultimately egoistic. The theory establishes no relation between motivations and religion, nor normative ethics, or specific rules as deontology would suggest.
