Answer:
2.64%
Explanation:
A = P(1 + r)^n
A = $12,000
P = $10,000
n = 7 years
12,000 = 10,000(1 + r)^7
(1 + r)^7 = 12,000/10,000 = 1.2
(1 + r)^7 = 1.2
1 + r = (1.2)^1/7
I + r = 1.0264
r = 1.0264 - 1 = 0.0264
r = 0.0264 × 100 = 2.64%
Answer:
c, I think
Explanation:
because if it is to convince the public to purchase the goods and services, then it would be the production of the goods and services.
Sorry, I don't know if this is correct or not, but I hope this answered your question. Have a nice day! ^ ^
Answer:
The correct answer is the option B: Institutes a dual hierarchy that violates the unity-of-command principle.
Explanation:
To begin with, in the business management field the concept known as "Matrix structure" or matrix management as well is refered to the dynamic way of organizating the company that has the characteristic of having the employees of the business answering directly to two or more superiors of leaders instead of just one. Therefore that in this type of organizational structure sometimes the matters of certain departments tend to interfere or collide with the objectives of others. That is the main reason why it does violates the principle of unity-of-command described in the organizational theory.
Answer:
1.50
Explanation:
The debt coverage ratio shows the extent to which the property is generating income in a bid to pay its debt service charge, it is computed using the below DSCR formula
DSCR= net operating income (NOI)/Debt service
net operating income (NOI)=$150,000
Debt service=interest expense or finance charge in the year=$100,000
DSCR=$150,000/$100,000
DSCR=1.50
The property in question is generating income that is 1.5 times its debt servce yearly
Answer: decreased by 8.5%
Explanation:
The beta coefficient of a stock is simply used to measure the volatility of a stock which is relative to the market.
From the question, we are informed that investor's portfolio has a beta coefficient of 0.85 and that the overall market declined by 10% over the course of a year.
Based on the information above, the value of the portfolio would have decreased by:
= 0.85/10
= 0.085
= 8.5%
