Answer:
49%
Explanation:
Expected sales growth rate of the venture is the summation of the weighted growth is sales for all predictions made by Lola.
Expected sales growth rate = ∑(
Where P(i) is the probability of a given predicted growth in sales, and G(i) is the predicted growth in sales.
Expected growth in sales of the venture =
(0.2*80%) + (0.3*60%) + (0.4*40%) + (0.1*-10%)
=16%+18%+16%-1%
=49%
Answer:
A company's stock
Explanation:
There are two main capital structure i.e. debt and the equity. The debt is the loan which is to be borrowed by the individual or a company in order to raise a capital. While the other one is equity in which it shows the ownership stake in the company also it involves the securities than should be traded in the stock markets
While going through the options given, the second option is correct as other options are the examples of debt and the same is not considered for an equity investment
Answer:
The correct answer is option A.
Explanation:
Monopolistic competition is a market structure where there is a large number of producers selling differentiated products. These firms are price makers. There is very low or no restriction on the entry and exit of new firms.
Positive economic profits earned by the existing firms will attract potential firms to enter the market. When new firms enter, it increases the supply in the market.
This causes the price and market share of existing firms to decline. As the individual demand curves of the existing firms shift to the left, their profits will increase as well.
Answer:
Option B
Explanation:
In trade, the characteristic that enables an organisation to surpass its rivals, is termed as competitive edge. A competitive edge might include access to markets like higher-grade minerals or small-cost energy sources, highly qualified labor, geographical location, high barriers to entry, and access to better technologies. Thus, every business enterprise makes strategies to get competitive edge for forming a separate and solid customer base.
Answer:
Consider the following explanation
Explanation:
Chicago's city chamber gave last endorsement on Wednesday to a $500m redesign of memorable Wrigley Field, which incorporates its first Jumbotron screen, improved offices for the players in the entrails of the 99-year-old ballpark and an inn over the road.
The true yearly impact is probably going to be far under $18 million. The fundamental explanation is that a great part of the extra expenditure in Wrigleyville would not be extra expenditure in Chicago. Whelps fans would have spent quite a bit of that cash somewhere else in Chicago if there had been no remodel to Wrigley Field or regardless of whether Wrigley Field didn't exist.
As it were, the remodel only initiates substitution spending, as Chicagoan's day of work their spending starting with one nearby relaxation movement then onto the next. Indeed, even the cash spent by tourists in Wringleyville probably won't be new spending if occupants of different urban communities choose to visit Wrigley Field instead of attractions, for example, the Chicago Art Institute, while they are visiting Chicago.