Answer:
1.What is the difference between the war for independence in 1810 and the Mexican Revolution that occurred in 1910? 1810 - Spain had been raising taxes so Mexico launched a revolt that ended in 1821 with Mexico winning independence from Spain. ... This is known as the Mexican Revolution.
2.Olemic Rule, Mayans, Aztecs, Conquistador Hernan Cortez defeated the Aztec Empire
3. When Christopher Columbus landed on the island of Hispaniola in 1492, he met natives there. When this was reported to Queen Isabella of Spain, she immediately decreed that the natives (Indians as the Spanish would call them) were her subjects and were morally equal to all her other subjects including the Spaniards themselves. They were to be treated humanely and not to be enslaved, and they were to be Christianized and Europeanized.
4.Remittances from the U.S. to Latin America have been on the decline in the 2000s and 2010s. While there was US$69.2 billion worth of remittances sent in 2008, that figure had fallen to US$58.9 billion for 2011. This pattern is a consequence of many components including the worldwide recession, more financial open doors in Latin American nations, and rising expenses charged by coyotes to carry migrants over the border.
5.Increased groundwater recharge, waterlogging, soil salinity. Increased groundwater recharge stems from the unavoidable deep percolation losses occurring in the irrigation scheme. The lower the irrigation efficiency, the higher the losses. ... As a result, the soil is no longer leached and soil salinity problems develop.
6.northern Mexico is arid and semi arid,southern Mexico is tropical wet and dry, and humid subtropical
Explanation:
<h2><u>
PLZ MARK AS BRAINLEST!!!</u></h2>
Answer: D
Explanation:
A capital city with its surrounding countryside and villiages
As someone who was too young at the time to fully appreciate the complexities of the political process at the time, I never understood why the Equal Rights Amendment was never passed. On the one hand, it seems a no-brainer, a basic statement of obvious human rights. However, trying to research online the reasons why it wasn't passed produces a whole bunch of feminist fruitcakery, including some who insist the amendment technically passed and is in effect. The original support for the amendment was among conservative women, while labor unions and "New Deal" types virulently opposed it an exact flip flop of the typical cliches and stereotypes of the political left and right.
My idle speculation is that the trouble stems from the second clause of the amendment as proposed: "The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article." That seems, in an era when people are arguing the constitutionality of mandating health insurance coverage, a loophole big enough through which to ram all sorts of trouble.
First factories were more efficient than the earlier putting-out system because it brought workers and machines in the same place.
That the U.S and France would never go war under any circumstances
