Answer:
It can be beneficial depending on the one being impeached
Explanation:
A good president that helped the country being impeached is detrimental while a bad president who made the country worse and caused a rift between the citizens being impeached is beneficial.
Explanation:
well I don't think anyone can answer this, because we don't know what the ring in Ahura Maza's hand looks like, so if you could edit the question by showing Ahura Maza's hand
The United States should be the correct answer
EXPLANATION:Hope this helps
The correct answer is: frontier farming became easier because there were new tools that helped break the soil faster. However, even though there were many useful tools for farming, it was also difficult for people to get a job since the machines were taking their places.
For example, there were new machines such as farming with windmills, steel plows and reaping machines which made harvesting quick and easy.
Nevertheless, it was hard for farmers to pay for these tools and put them in debts. They dealt with economic problems as crop prices dropped and their debts grew.
The Mexican did maintained their stance when it comes to slavery. The Mexico's position on slavery immediately prior to the Texas Revolution was that they abolished slavery (sales of slaves) in 1829.
Pruor to Texas revolution, In 1823, the Mexican government forbade the sale or purchase of slaves and they henceforth required the children of slaves to be freed when they reached the age of fourteen.
The stopping of slavery was a major cause of the Mexican Independence movement, so therefore, the Mexican government adopted a number of laws to against slaveholding
Learn more from
brainly.com/question/11535956
