Answer:
The answer to the following question is given below :
Explanation:
- The typical model of production was structured to meet the challenges and bring benefits. With new capacity and operating results, the supply chain has become progressively more competitive and efficient.
- The modern supply chain is tailored to meet evolving customer needs. Freight capacity and administrative performance have become more reliable and cost-effective. Supply chain structures can supply the goods at exact times.
Answer:
(B) $20 billion
Explanation:
Given a certain level of MPC, an increase in government spending (G) by a certain amount translates to an increase in aggregate demand (AD) through the relationship below.
where Δ means <em>change.</em>
<em />
Therefore, given ΔAD of $50 billion, and MPC of 0.6,
= 
= 
= ΔG = 50 * 0.4 = 20
Therefore, increase in government purchases = $20 billion.
When a firm's customers make investments in order to use its particular product or service, the customers incur switching costs if they purchase another firm's products or services instead. Therefore, the option B holds true.
<h3>What is the significance of switching costs?</h3>
The switching costs can be referred to or considered as the costs incurred by the customers of a product or a service when they use the alternatives or the competitive products available in the market, instead of the product they were using earlier.
Therefore, the option B holds true and states regarding the significance of the switching costs.
Learn more about switching costs here:
brainly.com/question/14728758
#SPJ1
When a firm's customers make investments in order to use its particular product or service, the customers incur which type of costs if they purchase another firm's products or services instead?
A. Acquisition costs
B. Switching costs
C. Alternative costs
D. Replacement costs
Answer: C. The court concluded that Microsoft violated the Sherman Act
Explanation: The case between United States v. Microsoft Corporation which took place at the
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit during the period February 26–27, 2001 and was finally decided June 28, 2001.
It was decided by the District Court that Microsoft violated the Sharma Antitrust Act of 1890.
Answer and Explanation:
The computation of the present values of both alternatives is shown below:
For alternative one, the lump sum amount is
= Yearly payment × PVIFA factor at 8% for 12 years
= $50,000 × 7.5361
= $376,805
And, in the alternative 2, the lumpsum amount i.e. present value is $452,000
So as we can see that the alternative 2 is better as the lumspsum amount is high as compared with the alternative 1
