Answer:
Congress.
Explanation:
The legislative branch is made up of the House and Senate, known collectively as the Congress. Among other powers, the legislative branch makes all laws, declares war, regulates interstate and foreign commerce and controls taxing and spending policies.
Answer:
Daniel Chirot is a Sociologist and Professor of International Studies at the University of Washington, Seattle.
He argued that the recent worldwide increase in ethnic hostilities is a consequence of retribalization.
His context of retribalization means the tendency for groups to seek meaning and belongin in an ethnic group. There are macro and micro explanations for terrorism.
Answer:
During the Mediaeval period, a large number of foreign travellers such as Ibn Battutah, Marco Polo, Alberuni etc visited India and have left an account of their observations.It is through these accounts that we have come to know about India in that period. Such accounts by foreign travellers are known as travelogues.
Answer:
The correct answer is d) Supply.
Explanation:
Companies work through supplies; these can be materials for the operation of the company, human resources, and the product offered to the customer. Generally, companies make inventories of supplies, to buy the products necessary to follow the management of the company, the acquisition of these products are made at different times depending on each company.
Likewise, suppliers are considered part of the capital of companies; some are tangible, and others intangible.
<em>I hope this information can help you.</em>
Answer:
What follows is a bill of indictment. Several of these items end up in the Bill of Rights. Others are addressed by the form of the government established—first by the Articles of Confederation, and ultimately by the Constitution.
The assumption of natural rights expressed in the Declaration of Independence can be summed up by the following proposition: “First comes rights, then comes government.” According to this view: (1) the rights of individuals do not originate with any government, but preexist its formation; (2) the protection of these rights is the first duty of government; and (3) even after government is formed, these rights provide a standard by which its performance is measured and, in extreme cases, its systemic failure to protect rights—or its systematic violation of rights—can justify its alteration or abolition; (4) at least some of these rights are so fundamental that they are “inalienable,” meaning they are so intimately connected to one’s nature as a human being that they cannot be transferred to another even if one consents to do so. This is powerful stuff.
At the Founding, these ideas were considered so true as to be self-evident. However, today the idea of natural rights is obscure and controversial. Oftentimes, when the idea comes up, it is deemed to be archaic. Moreover, the discussion by many of natural rights, as reflected in the Declaration’s claim that such rights “are endowed by their Creator,” leads many to characterize natural rights as religiously based rather than secular. As I explain in The Structure of Liberty: Justice and the Rule of Law, I believe his is a mistake.
