Q1. The answer is 612.50
The function is C(p) = 175 + 3.5p
p - the number of pots
If we need to produce 125 pots, then p = 125
C(p) is then C(125). So calculate C(125)
C(125) = 175 + 3.5 * 125 = 175 + 437.5 = 612.5
So, the production of 125 pots costs $612.5.
Q2. The answer is 78.
The function is C(p) = 175 + 3.5p
C(p) is the cost of producing a p number of pots.
If our budget is $450, then C(p) = 450. So, we need to calculate p.
C(p) = 450
C(p) = 175 + 3.5p
450 = 175 + 3.5p
3.5p = 450 - 175
3.5p = 275
p = 275/3.5
p = 78.57
So, the number of pots that can be produced for $450 is 78.
We got 78.57 for p, but it must be rounded to the smallest rounded number because you cannot produce 0.57 of a pot.
Q: How much did Jay have to pay excluding his share of the insurance premium?
A: $1800+$200 = $2000
Q: How much did Jay's company pay for his insurance premium?
A: $700. If Jay's $350 is 1/3 of the premium , then Jay's company pays 2*$350=$700 as rest of his premium.
Q: Jay paid 10% and the plan paid 90% beyond the deductible. How much did Jay's insurance company pay total?
A: Jay's insurance company paid $16200. Given that Jay paid $1800 beyond his deductible of $200 (and that is 10% of the actual cost) means that his plan (insurance company) paid 90%=9*$1800=$16200.
Q: How much did Jay have to pay total, including his share of the premium?
A: Jay paid $2350. He paid $200 deductible + $1800 beyond deductible + $350 premium
Answer:
you havent posted picture or written out the question
No. Terrell is not correct. Terrell is incorrect. The method he offers is
inappropriate, inapplicable, and lacks veracity, and as a mathematician,
Terrell himself is devoid of integrity. If his method is implemented, it
cannot accurately compute the capacity of Dominic's water jug in fluid
ounces. It will produce a number that is inaccurate, fallacious, mistaken,
erroneous, and incorrect. Moreover, the solution will be wrong.
If the units are carried through with the calculation ... as always they must ...
then it will immediately become clear that Terrell's method has produced a
solution with units of "square quarts per ounce", whereupon any witnesses
should justifiably become nauseous. Terrell's method should be disdained,
rejected, discarded and ignored.
==> 1.25 should not be "divided" by 32.
==> Instead, 1.25 should be multiplied by 32.
The modified method will produce a result with units of "fluid ounces" ...
the first indication to the assembled multitude that whatever the number
is, there is a reasonable chance that it could be a correct one.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
ab=ab (common)
angle d = angle c (isosceles prperty)
angle a = angle a (common)
there for the triangle is congruent so sides are congruent by CPCT
