We write and speak in three different 'persons' . . .
Let's say I'm telling you something about Sam.
I'm the first person. You're the second person. Sam is the third person.
First Person: I, we, us
Second Person: You, you-all
Third Person: He, she, it, they, them
So there are three different ways to write or tell the same story.
Most stories that you read are written either in the First person or the Third person.
<u>"First-person narrative" is a story being told by the person it's about</u>.
"I'm Al. I got up in the morning. Then I got dressed, I went to the store, and bought milk."
"Third-person narrative is a story being told about somebody.
"Sam got up in the morning. Then he got dressed, he went to the store, and he got milk."
I saved "Second-person narrative" for last, because it's not used very often
and so it sounds weird. But there ARE whole books written in Second-person:
"Your name is Johhny Schlaffgut. You went to bed early last night because
yesterday was a tough day at the office and you were tired. But this morning
you felt OK. You woke up, you got dressed, and you went to the store for milk."
The most admirable character in the war of the worlds was the character played by Tom cruise. The character, even though he was in a situation where he could run away because the kids that lived with him were his first wife's, he still protected them and played with his own life to save theirs.
Answer: A 2014 Supreme Court decision regarding newspaper censorship
Explanation:
It should be noted that the original source of information which are called the primary source include autobiography, artifact, document, recordings etc. which are created during the period under study.
Regarding the options given, a 2014 Supreme Court decision regarding newspaper censorship is the most credible one to use in an article about limits on freedom of speech in the United States. It gives a true and original description of the topic at hand.
On the other hand, a blog post, a video
podtbon social media or newspaper column advocating limits on free speech doesn't give the original information source as the content could have been manipulated.
Therefore, the correct option is A.
This is actually pretty cute, I'd be glad too
