<span>The question is incomplete, here is the complete question which I previously came across;</span>
When Janice went to work as a hair stylist in Rick's beauty shop, she entered into an agreement with Rick, whereby, if she left she would not work for another beauty shop within 50 miles for 2 years. Rick trained Janice in a number of new techniques. After nine months, Janice was offered a great job down the street at a new beauty shop, quit Rick, and had a number of customers follow her down the street to her new job. Rick claimed that she had signed a contract and had no right to go to work at the new shop. Janice disagreed and told Rick that no judge in the country would enforce such an agreement. Janice told Rick that she was more worried about a customer, Treena, who was threatening to sue her because her hair turned green after Janice worked on it. Janice agreed that Treena's hair was damaged. Janice pointed out, however, that she told Treena that odd results could result from a dye attempt, and she required that Treena sign a contract releasing Janice from all liabilities before she did anything with Treena's hair. Treena, however, sued anyway. The agreement Rick and Janice entered into is referred to as?
The answer is, the agreement Rick and Janice entered into is referred to as "<span>covenant not to compete".</span>
<span>
</span>
It is hard
to decide if a judge will implement a non-competition agreement. While the privileged insights of a business are important,
the law additionally puts value to a person's opportunity to seek after other
work. To be enforceable Courts more often than not require that a contract not
to compete be sensible. In California, non-competes are adequately unlawful
except if you are selling a business. Different states will implement a few provisions,
as a rule the trade secret protection, however not the work limitations.
A. Pure competition
Pure competition describes a market with a wide range of competing businesses all selling the same product, in this case milk.
Monopolies are a single company running the market, and oligopoly markets have a small number of players who together control the vast majority.
Answer:
The correct asnwer is $-214 billion.
Explanation:
A surplus occurs when an account exceeds the credit after having paid all its debts and obligations.
As the example says, assuming that China’s net debt forgiveness was zero in 2012, then the net balance of China's financial account balance would be -214 billion.
This means that China would be facing a deficit.
A defit means that more money comes out of our company's account than it enters.
Which causes China to have a<u> negative balance account.</u>
The following policies would bring the economy to potential output is Decrease government spending by $10 billion.
<h3>
What is Marginal Propensity?</h3>
The "Marginal Propensity" to consume is defined as calculate quantification of money that consumers are ready to spend.
The term "Marginal propensity" to consume is term used in economics. It measures monetary value which consumer is willing to spend to buy goods and services instead of saving it.
The "Marginal Propensity" to consume tends to increase economic activities of country by keeping cash flowing and by not keeping it stagnant. It also helps in increasing trade value and quality and cost of products because it increases healthy competition among companies and in which consumers are ultimately benefitted.
Therefore , we can conclude that the correct option is C.
Learn more about Marginal propensity on:
brainly.com/question/17930875
#SPJ4
Answer:
72 hours, 12months
Explanation:
When a user gets locked out of his/her account, it is usually investigated within 72 hours of the complaint being laid. that is 3days.
When the reason is found and and told to the user, the reason is documented and kept for 12 months within which time if there is any need for reference, the document can be easily retrieved and gone through.
Cheers.
