Answer:
Option 2 is the right answer
Explanation:
When government obtains any evidence though a conduct deemed unconstitutional (unlawful search or seizure), such evidence would be suppressed by the court. When the defendant is brought to court for eventual trial, such evidence would be inadmissible. U.S courts have used this rule in several occasions, to prevent police officers and agents of the government from abusing constitutional rights of the people.
Answer:
The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLB)
Explanation:
The Gramm–Leach–Bliley Act (GLB) is a law that came into being to repeal existing laws so that banks, investment companies, and other financial services companies could merge. It was enacted in November 1999 by the 106th Congress of the United States.
This law is applicable to the entire insurance agents, brokers, and financial institutions and it highlights the rules around the privacy of information these agencies obtain from customers.
Answer:
I agree with the decision of the case because in the declaration of independence paragraph two it states, "All men are created equal." it would be unconstitutional for schools to be separated based on the color of there skin. I wouldnt have done anything differently if I were a judge of the supreme court because I would know that it violates the the 14 Amendment.
Answer:
He signed the Civil Rights Act of 1964
Answer:
The Integrated Automated Fingerprint Identification System (or IAFIS) is an electronic database that contains electronic fingerprint records from federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies across the country. It allows these fingerprint records to be easily shared.
Explanation:
