Answer:
i’m white and i agree with you, there is no reason for people to be treated differently because of race
Explanation:
This is based on who is telling the truth. The defendant denys being in the city at the time of the murder, but then a local newspaper states that he heard gunshots from inside his apartment the day of the murder (which would be impossible if he wasn't in the city at the same of the murder). There could also be a chance that the newspaper could be lying mainly because the defendant objected that the evidence was correct. In this case, the judge should take this into consideration especially when a local newpaper article announced that the defendant heard gunshots after saying that he was never in the city. So I would say, the newspaper article could be evidence to prove that the defendant is responsible for the murder.
Answer:
It requires sufficient evidence before moving to trial in cases of serious crimes.
Explanation:
As you may already know the court by Jurí is responsible for judging malicious crimes against life. In this type of court, it is up to a popular panel - the jury drawn to make up the sentencing council - to declare whether the crime in question has happened and whether the defendant is guilty or not guilty. This type of trial is very important and protects the rights of the accused, as the case must be explained to the jury in a very detailed manner, explaining all the evidence. Thus, it is more difficult for the accused to be unjustly convicted.
The answer is B ddddddddddd
Answer:
When making PRIVACY related decisions in the courts in the US, the courts will base their decisions on the Fourteenth Amendment.
Explanation:
The Fourteenth Amendment adopted in July 9, 1868, addresses the citizenship's right and equal protection under the law and was proposed to response to issues related to former slaves after the American Civil War.
The courts mostly base their judgements on Section 1 of the Amendment which expressly stated that "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunity of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws".
