All categories

3 years ago

Business do not maximise output from the given inputs

Business

1 answer:

Ganezh [65]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

Allocative inefficiency.

Explanation:

Factors of production can be defined as the fundamental building blocks used by individuals or business firms for the manufacturing of finished goods and services in order to meet the unending needs and requirements of their customers.

In Economics, there are four (4) main factors of production and these are;

I. Land.

II. Labor (working).

III. Capital resources.

IV. Entrepreneurship.

When these aforementioned factors of production are combined effectively and efficiently, they can be used for the manufacturing or production of goods and services to meet the unending requirements or needs of the consumers.

Basically, there are two (2) types of inefficiency associated with the production of goods and services to meet the unending requirements or needs of consumers, these includes;

1. Technical (productive) inefficiency: it occurs when a company or business firm produce goods and services that consumers do not want. This is typically as a result of the incorrect and inefficient allocation of scarce resources by a business firm or entity.

2. Allocative inefficiency: it occurs when a company or business firm do not maximise output from the given inputs such as raw materials, capital, etc. Thus, it arises when businesses fail to increase the level of their production or productivity from a number of given inputs.

Hence, when a business do not maximise output from the given inputs, it is referred to as an allocative inefficiency.

<em>In conclusion, allocative inefficiency typically occurs when the price of a good or service isn't equal to its marginal cost i.e P ≠ MC.</em>

You might be interested in

Varun's coaching center trains runners for elite races. last week, varun fired one of his ineffective coaches, and immediately t

ladessa [460]

<span>The marginal product of the previous coach would have been negative because the removal of the last coach improved the performance of the runners which had decreased owing to negative marginal product of the coach.</span>

7 0

3 years ago

Ethics is defined as A) formal codes that permit or forbid certain behaviors. B) a general rule of conduct of personal behavior,

mixer [17]

Answer:

Ethics is defined as moral principles that governa person's behaviour or the conducting of an activity

6 0

3 years ago

Classifying events as asset source, use, or exchange Vera Company experienced the following events during its first year of oper

pav-90 [236]

Answer:

Vera Company

1. Acquired $16,000 cash from the issue of common stock. [ Exchange; Cash balance increases while Owners Equity also increases. The net effect is zero ]

2. Paid $3,500 cash for salary expenses [ Asset Use; because we deplete Cash as an asset to pay for an expense item]

3. Borrowed $10,000 cash from New South Bank. [ Exchange. We got cash (an asset) but created a liability through bank loan, net effect is zero]

4. Paid $6,000 cash to purchase land. [ Exchange; depleted Cash (an Asset) to obtain another Asset (Land) net effect is zero]

5. Provided boarding services for $10,500 cash. [ Asset Source; income is driving up our cash balance (an Asset)]

6. Acquired an additional $1,000 cash from the issue of common stock. [ Exchange; Cash balance increases while Owners Equity also increases. The net effect is zero ]

7. Paid $2,400 cash for utilities expense. [ Asset Use; because we deplete Cash as an asset to pay for an expense item]

8. Paid a $1,500 cash dividend to the stockholders. [ Asset Use; because we deplete Cash as an asset to pay for dividend to shareholders]

9. Provided additional services for $6,000 cash. [ Asset Source; income is driving up our cash balance (an Asset)]

10. Purchased additional land for $2,500 cash. [ Exchange; depleted Cash (an Asset) to obtain another Asset (Land) net effect is zero]

11. The market value of the land was determined to be $24,000 at the end of the accounting period. :[ Asset Source; improvement in fair valuation of Asset]

8 0

3 years ago

Desert Rose, Inc., a prominent consumer products firm, is debating whetherto convert its all-equity capital structure to one tha

Rina8888 [55]

Answer:

A. $450

B. $480

C. $540

D. The choice of capitl structure is irrelevant because the amount of $480 is the payoff amount based on the proposed capital structure with 30% debt, which indicate that investors cannot make use of home leverage to help create the capital structure as well as the payoffs they like.

Explanation:

a) Calculation to determine her cash flow under the current capital structure

First step is to calculate the earnings per share

EPS = $29,000 / 6,500 shares

EPS = $4.5

Now let calculate the cash flow under the current capital structure

Cash flow = $4.5*(100 shares)

Cash flow = $450

Therefore her cash flow under the current capital structure will be $450

b) Calculation to determine What will be the cash flow be under the proposed capital structure of the firm

First step is to calculate the earnings per share

First step is to calculate the MV of the firm

MV of the firm= $45(6,500)

MV of the firm= $292,500

Second step is to calculate the Debt

Debt = .30 x ($292,500)

Debt= $87,750

Third step is to calculate the Interest

Interest =8% x $87,750

Interest = $7,020

Fourth step is to calculate the repurchase shares

Repurchase shares =$87,750 / $45

Repurchase shares= 1,950

Fifth step is to calculate the Shrout new

Shrout new =6,500 - 1,950

Shrout new=4,550

Therefore, under the new capital structure,

EPS = (EBIT - Interest) / shares outstanding new

EPS = ($29,000 -$7,020) / 4,550shares

EPS =$21,980/4,550 shares

EPS =4.8

The shareholder will receive = $4.8*(100 shares) = $480

Therefore What will be the cash flow be under the proposed capital structure of the firm is $480

c) Calculation to Show how she could unlever her shares of stock to re-create the original structure.

Now she owns a total of 200 shares

Her payoff =[ (100 shares+100 shares) x $4.5 ]- [8% x $(100 shares x $45)]

Her payoff =(200shares×$4.5)-(8%×$4,500)

Her payoff =$900-$360

Her payoff= $540

Therefore Based on the above Calculation Allison did not successfully replicate the payoffs (b) under the proposed capital structure

d).Based on the above Calculation the choice of capitl structure is irrelevant because the amount of $480 is the payoff amount based on the proposed capital structure with 30% debt, which indicate that investors cannot make use of home leverage to help create the capital structure as well as the payoffs they like.

7 0

3 years ago

Bramble Corp. recorded operating data for its auto accessories division for the year. Sales $790000 Contribution margin 260000 T

Andrei [34K]

Answer:

80%

Explanation:

For computing the return on investment first we have to need the following calculations

New contribution margin = Old contribution margin + increase in contribution margin

= $260,000 + $30,000

= $290,000

And,

Net Income = Contribution margin - Total direct fixed costs

= $290,000 - $90,000

= $200,000

ROI = Net income ÷ average operating assets

= $200,000 ÷ $250,000

= 80%

3 0

3 years ago

Business do not maximise output from the given inputs​

Business do not maximise output from the given inputs