1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
NeTakaya
3 years ago
9

An animal runs 4 meters east, and then 4 meters west, all in 10 seconds.

Law
1 answer:
Serjik [45]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

v = 0.8 m/s (west)

Explanation:

Given that,

An animal runs 4 meters east, and then 4 meters west, all in 10 seconds.

We need to find animal's velocity.

Displacement of animal = final position - initial position

= -4-4

= - 8 m

Average velocity = total displacement/time

So,

v=\dfrac{-8}{10}\\\\v=-0.8\ m/s

So, the animal's velocity is 0.8 m/s due west.

You might be interested in
Which of the following best illustrates an application of Newton’s First Law (also called the Law of Inertia)? A A passenger not
kodGreya [7K]

Answer:

D. All of the Above

Explanation: Newton’s first law is “An object at rest stays at rest and an object in motion stays in motion with the same speed and in the same direction unless acted upon by an unbalanced force” So if a pencil is rolling on a table and you stop it with you hand instead of letting it roll of the table in this case, the pencil is the object in motion and you are the unbalanced force.

6 0
3 years ago
An optionor and optionee make a contract for an option on a commercial piece of property. If the optionee decides to exercise hi
andrezito [222]

Answer:

He must exercise his option under the terms of the option contract. Illumination: Options are generally concerned with only two things: time and price. He must exercise his option under the terms of the option contract

8 0
3 years ago
Must all elements of probable cause exist before a lawful arrest can be made?
kkurt [141]

householdThereWhichever,

Probable cause is a requirement found in the Fourth Amendment that must usually be met before the police make an arrest, conduct a search, or receive a warrant.

“Probable cause” is a legal standard applied to the police and prosecutors; individual citizens don’t “get” probable cause.

Police must demonstrate sufficient probable cause to believe that there is evidence of a crime to obtain a search warrant or an arrest warrant.

Prosecutors must demonstrate sufficient probable cause as to every element of a charged crime to proceed with filing charges and beginning the trial process.

There is no clear legal definition of what constitutes “probable cause” — it’s somewhere between suspicion and proof. The closest you’ll come is the 1949 case Brinegar v. the United States in which the Supreme Court described it thus:

“…where the facts and circumstances within the officers' knowledge, and of which they have reasonably trustworthy information, are sufficient in themselves to warrant a belief by a man of reasonable caution that a crime is being committed.”

Please imagine a situation when someone very healthy falls ill all of a sudden and the reason is not immediately known. You take that person to a doctor and the doctor will ask you to identify the root cause of the illness, generally as under:

type of food the person ate recently

what liquids he/she consumed

whether he/she traveled recently and had food from outside,

whether affected by climate change,

whether any drastic change in his/her daily routine etc.

any other likely change in his/her work schedule

The above list could be the probable causes from which the doctor can identify the root cause for the illness.

II. Similarly, when an inexplicable accident happens(the driver cannot find out the cause), several questions like the following may be asked:

was there break failure

did one of the tires burst

was the driver distracted by someone(suddenly crossing the road etc.)

did the driver doze off(sleep for a while)

The above can be considered as the probable causes, to arrive at the root cause of the accident.

This is cause and this is the effect is a highly scientific approach and it is hardly possible in less than 1% of our day-to-day life despite our 99% dependence on only science-originated things. It is a decision without measurements, proper logic errors, etc., we are forced to land in probability and possibility. Maximum experience is in medical decisions, especially in new upcoming nuisance topics like a corona. Only probable cause is guessed. There is nothing when a patient comes with corona. Whichever is the cause treat him with your best tools as a doctor? Those who work in huge projects of prevention, curtailing, “stop-the-spread” projects will break their heads.

A simple example from a household happening. The jewel kept on a chair just temporarily is missing. 1. Somebody should have kept it safely 2. Somebody should have pocketed it on a non-returnable basis 3. The servants should have taken full benefit of our negligence and we should start searching for what more is stolen 4. The jeweler whom we told that we have some repair work should have come and taken it for repair, we telephone and find out. 5. Government announced gold control when Morarji was P.M. Some excise officer should have read it now, noticed our careless and taken it.

Which out of these is most probable?

Nothing! The jewel was under the cushion of the chair.

Two servants were dismissed forever. There is no excise department connection with that jewel. Nobody can keep it more safely than what the jewel can keep its good self. That jeweler has left the city two years ago.

All guesswork done is included in only probable causes, many cause foolish. Some are probable. But the actual happening has not chosen that. It is the house that has chosen those causes. The scientific or guess ability of the house is clear to them at least.

Probable cause is a guesswork cause that may be or may not be tallying with the truth. The correct guess is 100% probable!

The jewel missing cause is 0% probable!

6 0
3 years ago
The conversation below took place between two U.S. citizens.
Arte-miy333 [17]

Answer:

2.freedom of speech

Explanation:

Kevin and Peggy are saying what they think about Police

5 0
1 year ago
a 60 kg ingot of brass consists of zinc and copper. 25% of the ingot consists of zinc. how many kilograms of copper does the ing
barxatty [35]

Answer: 45kg

Explanation:

Since 25% of the ingot consists of zinc, it implies that (100 - 25) = 75% of copper is contained in the ingot.

We then calculate 75% of 60kg to get the amount of kilograms of copper that the ingot of brass contain​. This will be:

= 75% × 60

= 75/100 × 60

= 0.75 × 60

= 45kg

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The fordney-mccumber act of 1922 helped boost the american economy by
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following items is not one of the five purposes of government?
    9·2 answers
  • 2. In which of these situations should you increase your following distance?
    6·1 answer
  • Por que el derecho no se puede ejercer de manera absoluta ?
    13·1 answer
  • Why might jurors struggle to reach a verdict? (Include 3 reasons)
    10·2 answers
  • What type of rock is formed from molten rock that has cooled and solidified?
    8·2 answers
  • Forces need to have a direct contact with an object to change its motion. true or false
    9·2 answers
  • Cases involving foreign governments or state v. state have original jurisdiction in the U.S. Supreme Court.
    15·1 answer
  • Explain the difference between civil law and criminal law
    14·1 answer
  • Explain how the forms of demand supply will eliminate a market surplus
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!