Pierre engaging in such actions is known as rationalizing.
When a person rationalizes a decision they:
- <em>T</em><em>ry to prove that what they did isn't bad </em>
- <em>C</em><em>ome up with some sort of reasoning to support their decision </em>
Pierre is clearly doing something wrong here by increasing expenses more than they are supposed to be. He however convinces himself that what he is doing is not bad because no one will notice.
He is therefore coming up with reasons to prove that what he is doing is not bad and we can conclude based on this fact that he is engaged in rationalizing his behavior.
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/14453354.</em>
Answer:
No
Explanation:
"It would be wrong to intentionally weaken our products with a government-ordered backdoor."
one reason being that if passcodes could be input electronically, iPhones would become easier to unlock via "brute force."
The government would be able to destroy the amazing privacy policy apple has
<span>The FDIC is an entity that provides insurance to personal banking accounts up to $5,000. These assured people that their money was safe and secure. This agency still functions today. It was created in 1933 as part of the </span>Emergency Bank Relief Act which <span>allowed a plan that would close down insolvent banks and reorganize and reopen those banks strong enough to survive</span>
Answer:
Confirmation bias.
Explanation:
Confirmation bias is defined as the tendency for an individual to recall and favour information that confirms one's previous beliefs or hypothesis. It is a form of cognitive bias.
In the given example Joe only accepted information that would confirm his belief that there are fewer cars on the road (that is his commute is now shorter).
He however rejected the information that he now works the night shift, a period when traffic is low.
