According to the case, the use of Ph.D. on the ads for hair care products by John Smith is considered an example of the fallacy of inappropriate expertise.
The provided statement is true.
<h3>What is a fallacy?</h3>
A fallacy is an unlawful statement that is used by someone in stating any reasoning or argument which can even be harmful to society.
In the given case, John is having Ph.D. degree in the archaeology field, and his attempt to use the word Ph.D. on the haircare goods marketed by him would be a fallacy in respect of inappropriate expertise. The fallacy could be the use of the Ph.D. word on ads and the inappropriate expertise is that he doesn't have any knowledge regarding skincare and dermatology area.
Therefore, this may create a harmful effect on the individuals who are buying them as it is not authorized by a dermatologist.
Learn more about the fallacy in the related link:
brainly.com/question/2516239
#SPJ1
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "C": one of the satisfactions of being a leader.
Explanation:
The satisfaction of being a leader implies all those benefits employees with high rank and influence in the companies have. Those satisfactions are not merely monetary but also include having a wider knowledge of what the purposes of the firm are in the short and long term.
Answer:
$ 10.38 billion
Explanation:
Using six-tenths rule
Estimated cost / the known cost = (size of the estimate / size of the known)^0.6
Estimate = $ 12 billion ( 110000/140000)^ 0.6
Estimate = $ 10.38 billion
Answer: Option (c) is correct.
Explanation:
Correct Option - An increase in the state of technology.
The aggregate supply curve in the long run is a vertical line and parallel to the y-axis. |t is perfectly inelastic in the long run.
Now, if there is increase in the money supply in the economy then this will increase the aggregate demand in the short run. Hence, aggregate demand curve shift rightwards, as a result real GDP increases in the short run and move beyond the potential level of real GDP.
Also, there is a creation of inflationary gap in the economy, as a result real GDP shifts back to its initial position at potential real GDP. So, there is no increase real GDP in the long run.
Similarly, decrease in interest rates and an increase in government spending will also results in inflationary gap in the economy. Therefore, doesn't affect the real GDP in the long run.
But an increase in the state of technology is capable of increasing real GDP in the long run. Improvement in the state of technology will shift the long run aggregate supply curve rightwards, as result there is an increase in potential GDP in the long run.