Answer
D) compared to the EOQ, the maximum inventory would be approx 30% lower.
Explanation
EOQ = √(2*Co*D/Cc)
EPQ= √ (2*Co*D/(Cc*(1-x)))
x=D/P
D = demand rate
P =production rate
Co=ordering cost
Cc=holding cost
1) The production rate would be about double the usage rate.
hence, P = 2D
x=D/2D=0.5
EPQ= √ (2*Co*D/((1-0.5)*Cc))
EPQ= √ (2*Co*D/0.5Cc)
EPQ=√ (1/0.5)*EOQ
EPQ=√ (2)*EOQ
EPQ=1.41*EOQ
Hence, EPQ is around 40% larger than EOQ.
Ans.: c) EPQ will be approximately 40% larger than the EOQ.
2) Compared to the EOQ, the maximum inventory would be
maximum inventory = Q
EPQ = 1.41 EOQ
EPQ = 1.41*Q
Q=EPQ/1.41
Q=0.71 EPQ
Hence, compared to EOQ, maximum inventory in EPQ is only 70% of that in EOQ model.
Answer:
$ 750
Explanation:
Total cost = average total cost × quantity = $ 2.75 × 600 = $ 1650
Total revenue = price × quantity = $ 4 × 600 = $ 2400
profit = $ 2400 - $ 1650 = $ 750
In a command economy, it is the b) government who decides what goods will be produced.
Answer:
0.37
Explanation:
The formula to compute the debt ratio is shown below:
= Total liabilities ÷ Total assets
where,
Total liabilities would be
= Current liabilities + Long term liabilities
= $75,000 + $35,000
= $110,000
And, the total assets would be
= $300,00
Now put these values to the above formula
So, the ratio would equal to
= $110,000 ÷ $300,000
= 0.37
Answer:
Opportunity cost is giving up the working at Mc Donald's
Explanation:
Opportunity cost is the term which is stated as the profit, value of something or the benefit which is given up for something in order to acquire or accomplish something else.
In this case, Alexandra wants to work at Mc D and play soccer. So, she decided to play soccer. Therefore, the opportunity cost is working at Mc Donald in order to play.
