Answer:
One possible confound for the experiment is the attitude of the research assistants.
Step-by-step explanation:
A confounder simply means a variable that has impact in influencing both the dependent variable and independent variable, causing a spurious association.
So, we can conclude that the attitudes of the research assistants have positive and negative impacts in determining the reactions of both participants in the experiment.
The rudeness of a research assistant will negatively impact the response of the participant allocated to him/her.
The calmness of the other research assistant will positively impact the response of the participant allocated to him/her.
Answer:
Attached is the sketch
X-axis intersections:
(-3,0)
(0,0)
(1,0)
Points of inflection:
(-1,319,-2.881) Concave upward
(0.569,1.041) Concave downward
Step-by-step explanation:
Desmos (I'm not allowed to post the link, pls search it up) is a great help for these type of problems!
Step-by-step explanation:
<em>Hi</em><em>,</em>
<em>Let's</em><em> </em><em>describe</em><em> </em><em>it</em><em> </em><em>in</em><em> </em><em>listing</em><em> </em><em>method</em><em>;</em>
<em>S</em><em>=</em><em> </em><em>{</em><em>8</em><em>,</em><em>1</em><em>6</em><em>,</em><em>2</em><em>4</em><em>}</em><em>.</em>
<em><u>Hope</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>you</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>got</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>it</u></em><em><u>.</u></em><em><u>.</u></em><em><u>.</u></em>
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
4 x 2 = 8
there fore, it would take 8 $ to buy 5 slices excluding the delvry.
so, 8 x 2 = 16
16$ total
pls give me brainliest