under Muslim control and ruled by Shari'ah, are considered Dar al Harb - enemy lands. Muslims, not submitted to Islamic Law in Muslim lands are considered “enemy ... Muslims, and the requirement for the establishment of the Caliphate. b. Fight and slay the unbelievers wherever ye find them, and lie in wait for them.
Answer:
The best answer to the question: If Erik uses the scientific method to investigate this, what type of research would he be doing, would be, observational as full participant.
Explanation:
In observational research methods, a person simply tries to answer a question, or solve an issue, by literally observing and experimenting on the field, without making changes to what is around. The question, or issue, will be resolved as the researcher observes the development of certain characteristics that would prove, or disprove, the question being researched, or solve, or not solve, the problem for which an answer is being sought. In this case, Erik wishes to see if his previous experiences dressing in business casual attire will repeat themselves when he is in college, and so, he not only wishes to test the theory that people approaches him easily if he is dressed in business casual, rather than in another attire, but he will become the test subject himself, becoming thus, a full participant. Erik will then observe the results of his experimentation, and thus come to an answer to his query.
Answer:Source Misattribution
Explanation:
What is Source Misattribution? Source Misattribution which is also referred to as source confusion, is a memory error. It results to being unable to recall where a particular memory comes from.
You find it hard to verify the information in your memory because eventhough you have a picture in your mind but you seem to find it hard to locate the primary source of that memory and a secondary source and your may find swapping them around.
It mostly increases when we try to imagine that something happened even if it didn't happen.
Answer:
U.S. Prison Population Hits All-Time High: 2.3 Million Incarcerated
Explanation:
There are several reasons why group problem-solving and decision making is more likely to produce the correct answer than in an individual setting.
One reason is that groups who act in a cooperative manner tend to do better than individuals, who are in a more competitive atmosphere. Group interaction facilitates collaboration, fresh ideas, and improved solutions.
Another reason why groups tend to do better is that a group has a better collective memory than one person does.
Lastly, a group working together can draw upon each other's strengths and talents, making the group more well-rounded and resource rich.
