Answer:
it is 4
Step-by-step explanation:
dxgfchv
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
You would use the equation, 
r= radius, n = number of sides
<em>So</em><em> </em><em>the</em><em> </em><em>right</em><em> </em><em>answer</em><em> </em><em>is</em><em> </em><em>1</em><em>.</em><em>8</em>
<em>Look </em><em>at</em><em> the</em><em> </em><em>attached</em><em> </em><em>picture</em>
<em>Hope</em><em> </em><em>it</em><em> </em><em>will</em><em> </em><em>help</em><em> </em><em>you</em>
<em>Good</em><em> </em><em>luck</em><em> </em><em>on</em><em> </em><em>your</em><em> </em><em>assignment</em>
Answer:
3
Step-by-step explanation:
<span>If a number is not a rational number, then it is not a whole number. The converse is true.
---> the sentence above is the only one that has true condition, true hypothesis and true conclusion.
You see:
></span><span>If a number is not a whole number, then it is not a rational number. The converse is false. ( converse must be true)
></span><span>If a number is a rational number, then it is a whole number. The converse is false. (converse must be true)
></span><span>If a number is not a rational number, then it is a whole number. The converse is false. (hypothesis should've been "then it is not a whole number")
</span><span>
In the Law of Detachment, if both conditional and hypothesis are true, then the conclusion is true.
</span><span>All whole numbers are rational numbers.
In the "If-the"n form: If a number is whole, then it is rational.
Given: 5 is a whole number.
Conclusion: 5 is rational.</span>
